Cited by 39Neurological diseases and metabolismIron Metabolism and DisordersMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation

Dusek, Petr, Schneider, Susanne A.·2012·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent years have witnessed the discoveries of several genes causing neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA) and subsequently their novel classification scheme was suggested. The first results of treatments with modern chelating drugs are also being published. RECENT FINDINGS: Most recently, mutations in the c19orf12 gene encoding a mitochondrial protein of unknown function were identified in patients suffering from hitherto unknown NBIA presenting with a clinical phenotype similar to pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) but with a slightly later onset. A case study has shown that mutations in the fatty-acid 2-hydroxylase gene may lead to various phenotypes combining the features of leukodystrophy and NBIA, supporting that abnormal metabolism of myelin and iron accumulation may have a common cause. A phase-II pilot study did not find any clinical improvement after chelating treatment in a group of PKAN patients. However, benefits of chelating treatment have been observed in individual patients with PKAN and idiopathic NBIA in another study. SUMMARY: This review gives an outline of the clinical presentations of recently discovered NBIA syndromes and summarizes the clues to their differential diagnosis. While chelating treatment still remains experimental, advances have been made regarding the indications of deep brain stimulation in symptomatic treatment of NBIAs manifesting with generalized dystonia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0b013e3283550cac

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In other rare genetic diseases of the neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation group, mutations disrupt proteins with cellular functions different from iron metabolism, and the mechanisms that result in brain iron overload are undefined.

    “In other rare genetic diseases of this group, such as pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, phospholipase A2G6-associated neurodegeneration, and Kufor-Rakeb disease, mutations disrupt proteins with cellular functions different from iron metabolism, and the mechanisms that result in brain iron overload are undefined.169–173”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dusek, P., & Schneider, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2012-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
499-506
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003148596
Cited by
39
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation, pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, leukodystrophy, iron accumulation, chelation therapy, deep brain stimulation, dystonia, differential diagnosis, myelin metabolism
MeSH terms
Brain, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Iron, Iron Chelating Agents, Mutation, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mitochondrial Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review