Cited by 1,280Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersSexual Differentiation and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 134 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Sex differences in autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Werling, Donna M., Geschwind, Daniel H.·2013·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A strong male bias in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) prevalence has been observed with striking consistency, but no mechanism has yet to definitively account for this sex difference. This review explores the current status of epidemiological, genetic, and neuroendocrinological work addressing ASD prevalence and liability in males and females, so as to frame the major issues necessary to pursue a more complete understanding of the biological basis for sex-differential risk. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies continue to report a male bias in ASD prevalence, but also suggest that sex differences in phenotypic presentation, including fewer restricted and repetitive behaviors and externalizing behavioral problems in females, may contribute to this bias. Genetic studies demonstrate that females are protected from the effects of heritable and de-novo ASD risk variants, and compelling work suggests that sex chromosomal genes and/or sex hormones, especially testosterone, may modulate the effects of genetic variation on the presentation of an autistic phenotype. SUMMARY: ASDs affect females less frequently than males, and several sex-differential genetic and hormonal factors may contribute. Future work to determine the mechanisms by which these factors confer risk and protection to males and females is essential.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0b013e32835ee548

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 134 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 68 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 39
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 36
70 of 70
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ASD transmission in most families does not follow an X-linked pattern.

    “ASD transmission in most families does not follow an X-linked pattern”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several ASD risk genes on the X chromosome all cause significant intellectual disability.

    “while several ASD risk genes have been identified on the X chromosome (e.g. FMRP, MECP2, NLGN3, NLGN4X), all cause significant ID”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    40-50% of Klinefelter syndrome cases arise from maternal nondisjunction of the X chromosome.

    “Since 40-50% of KS cases arise from maternal nondisjunction of the X”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    RORA has a role in cerebellar and Purkinje cell development and in neuroprotection from oxidative stress.

    “since RORA has a role in cerebellar and Purkinje cell development, and neuroprotection from oxidative stress.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sex chromosomal abnormalities frequently affect gonadal function.

    “sex chromosomal abnormalities frequently affect gonadal function.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Opposite hormone effects on RORA are reported

    Minor

    The main text says estradiol activates RORA and testosterone inhibits it, while the description of reference 75 says testosterone activates RORA and estrogen inhibits it. These opposing directions affect the proposed hormone-feedback mechanism.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kanner, 1943, Nervous Child, 2, 217
  2. 2012, MMWR Surveill Summ, 61, 1
  3. Dworzynski, 2012, sychiatry, 51, 788
  4. Geier, 2007, Neuro Endocrinol Lett, 28, 565
  5. Takagishi, 2010, Neuro Endocrinol Lett, 31, 837

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,201–1,280 of 1,280

Metadata

Authors
Werling, D. M., & Geschwind, D. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Geschwind, Daniel H.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2013-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
146-153
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087547434
Cited by
1,245
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH093086)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sex differences, sex differences in phenotype, restricted and repetitive behaviors, externalizing problems, de novo mutations, sex chromosome genes, sex hormones, testosterone, neuroendocrinology, genetic risk
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review