Cited by 8Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Impact of preoperative weight loss on 30-day complication rate after bariatric surgery

Saleh, Omnia S, Farag, Youssef M K, Medhati, Pourya, Tavakkoli, Ali·2024·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of preoperative weight loss on surgical outcomes and operating room (OR) times after primary bariatric procedures, including laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study uses the 2021 MBSAQIP dataset. Preoperative total weight loss (TWL)% was calculated. Patients were then divided in to 4 groups: those with no weight loss, lost <0 to <5%, lost ≥5% to <10%, or lost ≥10% TWL preoperatively. These groups were then stratified into those with BMI less than 50 kg/m 2 and those with BMI 50 kg/m 2 or more and 30-day outcomes and OR times were compared. RESULTS: Analysis included 171,010 patients. For BMI less than 50 kg/m 2 , preoperative weight loss led to no consistent improvement in surgical outcomes. Although >0% to <5% TWL led to a decrease in intra- and postoperative occurrences after RYGB and a decrease in reoperation rates after LSG, these observations were not seen in those with higher degree of weight loss. In patients with BMI 50 kg/m 2 or more, preoperative weight loss showed a consistent improvement in reintervention rates after LSG, and readmission rates after RYGB. There was no improvement in other outcomes, however, irrespective of degree of preoperative weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery, preoperative weight loss does not lead to a consistent improvement in outcomes or OR times. In those with BMI 50 kg/m 2 or more, there may be improvement in select outcomes that is procedure-specific. Overall, these data do not support a uniform policy of preoperative weight loss, although selective use in some high-risk patients may be appropriate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/xcs.0000000000001036

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saleh, O. S., Farag, Y. M. K., Medhati, P., & Tavakkoli, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Tavakkoli, Ali
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2024-02-12
Volume
238
Issue
6
Pages
993-999
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391746163
Cited by
8
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
preoperative weight loss, bariatric surgery, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 30-day postoperative complications, operating room time, reoperation, hospital readmission, morbid obesity, extremely obese patients, MBSAQIP
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gastrectomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Surgery, Preoperative Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review