Cited by 50Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatmentElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Involuntary treatment in Europe: different countries, different practices

Jacobsen, Torsten B.·2012·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Involuntary treatment is burdened by the lack of evidence. One of the challenges is the difference in practice across borders in Europe. While reviewing the current literature, a proposal of monitoring guidelines is discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: The field is characterized by a small number of dedicated researchers. A study of violence in first-episode psychosis shows that differences in criteria for involuntary admission lead to different prognosis for the patients. The most recent contributions from the cross-national EUNOMIA study point to great variation across countries, regarding frequencies of involuntary admission as well as outcome. The EUNOMIA study provides suggestions for good quality in involuntary admission. A Cochrane review has examined the evidence of involuntary community treatment compared with standard treatment. The effectiveness of involuntary community treatment is limited. The review concludes that the benefits for a small number of patients are outweighed by the high numbers needed to treat in terms of avoided re-admission. SUMMARY: Despite pioneering work, involuntary treatment is still caught up in tradition. There is a lack of standard and proof of effectiveness. A proposal of monitoring guidelines for involuntary measures is a first step to improve the situation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0b013e32835462e3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobsen, T. B.
Affiliations
European Union of Medical Specialists (BE)
Corresponding author
Jacobsen, Torsten B.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2012-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
307-310
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044371550
Cited by
50
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
involuntary treatment, involuntary admission, first-episode psychosis, cross-national variation, monitoring guidelines, hospital readmission, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Europe, Hospital Administration, Humans, Mental Health Services, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review