Cited by 12Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEthics and bioethics in healthcareHealth, Medicine and Society

Practical Issues of Medical Experts in Assessing Persons With Mental Illness Asking for Assisted Dying in Switzerland

Open access
Hachtel, Henning, Häring, Daniel, Kochuparackal, Tanya, Graf, Marc, Vogel, Tobias·2022·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

With about 65,000 deaths per year in Switzerland, about 1,000 assisted suicides of Swiss citizens are carried out with the help of assisted dying organizations per year. Assisted suicide, which is carried out without selfish motives on the side of the helping person, only remains unpunished if there is a free will decision by the person willing to die who has the capacity of judgement and to act independently. While this is usually accepted as an option for somatically terminally ill patients in society at large, this procedure is controversial for psychiatrically ill patients. In Switzerland the topic of assisted dying is highly debated between medical professionals. In 2018, the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) put revised guidelines into force, which are in discrepancy to the current rules of the Swiss Medical Association (FMH). This article gives an overview of the past and current development of the Code of Professional Conduct and medical-ethical guidelines as well as current Swiss criminal and medical law on this topic. Practical implications for the assessment of assessing persons with mental illness in this circumstances are discussed. It is to be concluded, that persons with a mental illness seem to face extra obstacles in relation with somatically ill persons as the assessment of the prerequisites comprises additional requirements. Among other issues there is an urgent need for the elaboration of contents to be assessed and standards of procedures. The procedures and guidelines to be elaborated should be scientifically accompanied in order to gain a more reliable basis for decision-making. Multidisciplinary assessments would help to avoid biases and blind spots of a mono-disciplinary assessments. In addition, even in the case of mentally ill people, their right to self-determined suicide should not be restricted by excessive hurdles in the assessment process. Lastly, reliable funding should be secured, as it is otherwise to be expected that the complex assessment of prerequisites through multi-professional-teams or just one assessor cannot be sustained. The exercise of fundamental rights must be possible for all persons to the same extent, regardless of their financial resources.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article reviews Swiss legal, ethical, and professional guidelines on assisted suicide for persons with mental illness and discusses practical problems in expert assessment. It argues that mentally ill persons face extra assessment obstacles compared with somatically ill persons, while their right to a self-determined death should not be restricted by excessive hurdles.

Key findings

  • In Switzerland, assisted suicide is legal if performed without selfish motives and based on a free, autonomous decision by a person with capacity of judgement; current case law permits it for persons with mental illness under certain circumstances.
  • With about 65,000 deaths per year in Switzerland, about 1,000 assisted suicides of Swiss citizens are carried out yearly by assisted dying organizations; Exit figures for 2018 indicate around 1.5% of all deaths of Swiss citizens involve assisted suicide.
  • The Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) 2018 guidelines and the Swiss Medical Association (FMH) rules are in discrepancy: the FMH rejected inclusion of the revised SAMS guidelines, so the 2004 version remained valid under FMH professional law until a 2021 version was approved in May 2022.
  • Of the four SAMS prerequisites for medically assisted suicide—capacity of judgement, autonomous will, severe suffering, and consideration of alternatives—only the first two have a legal basis; the others are non-binding requirements from a private organization.

Methods

  • Narrative overview/commentary article, not an empirical study; it reviews past and current Swiss criminal and medical law, SAMS and FMH guidelines, and Federal Supreme Court decisions on assisted suicide.
  • It draws on cited literature, surveys, and official statistics, including a May 2010 representative national survey of around 1,500 Swiss people and Swiss Federal Statistical Office data up to 2014.
  • Main analysis is legal-ethical synthesis and discussion of practical implications for assessing persons with mental illness requesting assisted dying.

Limitations

  • The paper does not present a formal limitations section; it states that there is no definition of how long an end-of-life wish must be “permanent,” that “severe suffering” leaves room for interpretation, and that standards for procedure, content, and form are missing.
  • It also states that funding for complex assessments is uncertain and that unclear compensation may limit access to qualified assessors.
  • Evident from the text: this is a Switzerland-specific narrative overview without primary data collection or systematic review methodology, so its conclusions rest on legal/ethical argument and cited secondary sources.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.909194

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisenone given

    According to current Swiss criminal and medical law, there is no prerequisite that for assisted suicide therapeutic options of an illness are exhausted.

    “Additionally to consider is that according to current Swiss criminal and medical law there is no prerequisite that for assisted suicide therapeutic options of an illness are exhausted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    The Swiss Federal Supreme Court held that an incurable, permanent, severe mental impairment, similar to a somatic impairment, may constitute a condition that makes the patient's life no longer worth living in the long term.

    “The court held that an incurable, permanent, severe mental impairment, similar to a somatic impairment may constitute a condition that makes the patient's life no longer worth living in the long term.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BGE 133 I 58 ff.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation

    The duties of a physician are governed by the law, not by any guidelines issued by private organizations.

    “The duties of a physician are governed by the law, not by any guidelines issued by private organizations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    This extra obstacle lowers the chances of persons with mental illness finding a professional willing and capable of assessing his/her wish for an assisted suicide and establishing whether the necessary prerequisites are fulfilled.

    “This extra obstacle lowers the chances of persons with mental illness finding a professional willing and capable of assessing his/her wish for an assisted suicide and establishing whether (or not) the necessary prerequisites are fulfilled.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    The Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated in a new decision at the end of 2021 that the rules of the SAMS and the FMH were not binding rules of purely private origin.

    “The Swiss Federal Supreme Court also stated in a new decision at the end of 2021 that the rules of the SAMS and the FMH were not binding rules of purely private origin (BGer 6B_646/2020, E. 1.6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BGer 6B_646/2020, E. 1.6

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • May combine two claims. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    A survey of German-speaking psychiatrists in Switzerland reported that the majority of respondents would not support a request for assisted suicide in cases of severe mental disorder.

    “A survey of German-speaking psychiatrists in Switzerland reported that the majority of respondents would not support a request for assisted suicide in cases of severe mental disorder (10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Hodel, 2019, Attitudes toward assisted suicide requests in the context of severe and persistent mental illness: a survey of psychiatrists in Switzerland, Palliat Support Care. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In Switzerland, about 1,000 assisted suicides of Swiss citizens are carried out per year, with about 65,000 deaths per year.

    “With about 65,000 deaths per year in Switzerland, about 1,000 assisted suicides of Swiss citizens are carried out with the help of assisted dying organizations per year.”
    • Also stated in: § Ethical and Medico-Legal Guidelines · plain
      “According to figures from the assisted dying organization Exit 2018, around 1.5% of all deaths of Swiss citizens involve assisted suicide by an assisted dying organization. With about 65,000 deaths per year, this means about 1,000 assisted suicides of Swiss citizens by all assisted dying organizations per year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A representative national survey in May 2010 of around 1,500 Swiss people showed a liberal attitude toward assisted suicide in general, but a more skeptical attitude toward extending assisted dying to people with severe mental disorders and to older, 'tired of life' people without physical complaints.

    “Also a representative national survey in May 2010 of around 1,500 Swiss people on their attitudes toward assisted suicide showed a liberal attitude in general, but a more skeptical attitude toward extending assisted dying to people with severe mental disorders and to older, “tired of life” people without physical complaints (9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Schwarzenegger, 2010, Was die Schweizer Bevölkerung von Sterbehilfe und Suizidbeihilfe hält: erste Resultate einer repräsentativen nationalen Befragung, Jusletter

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    There is no statement to be found after which time period an end-of-life-wish is to be considered 'permanent,' especially regarding mental illnesses.

    “There is, e.g., no statement to be found after which time period an end-of-life-wish is to be considered “permanent,” especially regarding mental illnesses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In 2014, for every 7 cases of suicide, there were 5 cases of assisted suicide in Switzerland.

    “In 2014, for every 7 cases of suicide, there were 5 cases of assisted suicide” (8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] StatistikB Todesursachenstatistik 2014 Assisterter Suizid (Sterbehilfe) und Suizid in der Schweiz.2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    As a trend for 2016, the numbers of cases of assisted suicide almost match those of conventional suicide.

    “Other literature state as a trend for 2016 that the numbers of cases of assisted suicide now almost match those of conventional suicide (6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Bartsch, 2019, Assisted suicide in Switzerland: an analysis of death records from swiss institutes of forensic medicine, Dtsch Arztebl Int. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The majority of the FMH rejected the inclusion of the revised SAMS guidelines into the Code of Professional Conduct, and the former version of 2004 is still valid under the FMH perspective.

    “As a consequence, the majority of the FMH rejected the inclusion of the revised guidelines into the Code of Professional Conduct and the former version of 2004 is still valid under the FMH perspective.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SAMS Medical-ethical guidelines of 2004 are still valid for professional law and declare that the end-of-life-wish is well weighed and permanent, including the evaluation of therapeutic possibilities against the background of personal experiences and value convictions.

    “The SAMS Medical-ethical guidelines of 2004 are still valid for professional law and declares that the end-of-life-wish is well weighed and permanent, including the evaluation of these therapeutic possibilities against the background of their personal experiences and value convictions (17).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Bosshard, 2005, Urteilsfähigkeit von Menschen mit psychischen Störungen und Suizidbeihilfe, Schweizerische Juristen-Zeitung.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2018, SAMS put revised guidelines into force, which are in discrepancy with current FMH rules.

    “In 2018, the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) put revised guidelines into force, which are in discrepancy to the current rules of the Swiss Medical Association (FMH).”
    • Also stated in: § Ethical and Medico-Legal Guidelines · plain
      “Although, the SAMS put the revised 2018 guidelines into force which leads to a discrepancy between the FMH-rules and the SAMS-rules.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] 2018, Richtlinien: Umgang mit Sterben und Tod

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many mental disorders are characterized by variable courses and may be influenced to a substantial degree by social conditions.

    “This argumentation can be followed as many mental disorders are characterized by variable courses and may be influenced to a substantial degree by social conditions (17).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Bosshard, 2005, Urteilsfähigkeit von Menschen mit psychischen Störungen und Suizidbeihilfe, Schweizerische Juristen-Zeitung.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The Federal Supreme Court distinguished between the desire to die due to a treatable mental disorder, which calls for treatment, and the desire to die based on a self-determined, well-reflected and durable decision of a person capable of judgment.

    “However, it needs to be distinguished between the desire to die due to a treatable mental disorder, which calls for treatment, and the desire to die based on a self-determined, well-reflected and durable decision of a person capable of judgment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BGE 133 I 58 ff.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The use of involuntary methods varies across Europe and obtaining clinical data about it is difficult.

    “Literature suggests that the use of involuntary methods varies across Europe and to obtain clinical data about it is difficult (12).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Jacobsen, 2012, Involuntary treatment in Europe: different countries, different practices, Curr Opin Psychiatry. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Assisted suicide of mentally ill persons should only be possible with the utmost restraint and supported by a professional opinion.

    “Furthermore, assisted suicide of mentally ill persons should only be possible with the utmost restraint and supported by a professional opinion (BGE 133 I 58 ff.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BGE 133 I 58 ff.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    As long as there are no legally binding guidelines, each expert must form his or her professional opinion according to his or her best professional knowledge and conscience, free of any guidelines.

    “As long as there are no legally binding guidelines, each expert must form his or her professional opinion according to his or her best professional knowledge and conscience, free of any guidelines.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    If the wish to die is based on an autonomous decision taking into account the overall situation determined by an in-depth expert psychiatric opinion, assisted suicide may be granted to mentally ill persons under certain circumstances.

    “If the wish to die bases on an autonomous decision which takes into account the overall situation which is to be determined by an in-depth expert (psychiatric) opinion, assisted suicide may also be granted to mentally ill persons under certain circumstances (7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Häring, 2017, Fünf Mythen über Suizidhilfeorganisationen Jusletter, 8 Mai

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If funding is not secured, the complex assessment of prerequisites through multi-professional teams or just one assessor cannot be sustained.

    “Lastly, reliable funding should be secured, as it is otherwise to be expected that the complex assessment of prerequisites through multi-professional-teams or just one assessor cannot be sustained.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
      “If funding is not secured, it is to be expected that the complex assessment of prerequisites through multi-professional-teams or just one assessor cannot be sustained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In palliative care medicine, the vaguely defined role of the patient was partly held responsible for the considerably varying guidelines on how to determine 'intolerable suffering' for the application of sedation therapy.

    “In palliative care medicine, the vaguely defined role of the patient was partly held responsible for the considerably varying guidelines how to determine “intolerable suffering” for the application of sedation therapy (18).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Schildmann, 2014, Palliative sedation therapy: a systematic literature review and critical appraisal of available guidance on indication and decision making, J Palliat Med. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Assisted suicide in Switzerland is legal if carried out without selfish motives and there is a free will decision by a person with capacity of judgement and to act independently.

    “Assisted suicide, which is carried out without selfish motives on the side of the helping person, only remains unpunished if there is a free will decision by the person willing to die who has the capacity of judgement and to act independently.”
    • Also stated in: § Ethical and Medico-Legal Guidelines · plain
      “Assisted suicide, which is carried out without selfish motives on the side of the helping person, is legal if there is a free will decision by the person willing to die who has capacity of judgement and to act independently.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The association of a more frequent involuntary aspect in psychiatric treatments and a higher perceived stigma of psychiatric diseases might help to explain the difference in regarding the possibility of assisted dying in mental and somatic disorders in the public.

    “The association of a more frequent involuntary aspect in psychiatric treatments and a higher perceived stigma of psychiatric diseases (13) might help to explain the difference in regarding the possibility of assisted dying in mental and somatic disorders in the public.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Looper, 2004, Perceived stigma in functional somatic syndromes and comparable medical conditions, J Psychosom Res. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Assisted dying is a relevant social phenomenon.

    “Accordingly, it can be assumed, that assisted dying is a relevant social phenomenon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a tension between the psychiatrically sometimes necessary compulsory treatment and the right of self-determination of mentally ill persons.

    “Thus, there is a tension between the psychiatrically sometimes necessary compulsory treatment and the right of self-determination of mentally ill persons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The severity of subjective suffering can only be approached by describing the practical life impact of the mental illness and the cognitive and emotional reaction of the assessed person.

    “Whilst this produces an approximation of the seriousness of functional limitations, the severity of subjective suffering can only be approached by describing the practical life impact of the mental illness and the cognitive and emotional reaction of the assessed person thereof.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The assessment of the capacity of judgement by expert assessors is a standard procedure which normally includes in Switzerland the evaluation of cognition, valuation capability, formation of will and willpower.

    “The assessment of the capacity of judgement by expert assessors is a standard procedure which normally includes in Switzerland the evaluation of cognition, valuation capability, formation of will and willpower (16).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The Federal Supreme Court's judgement defined as requirements for assisted suicide the personal examination and assessment of capacity of judgment by the physician, an informative interview, a correct diagnosis and indication.

    “As part of the regulation of assisted suicide the Federal Supreme Court's judgement defined as requirements the personal examination and assessment of capacity of judgment by the physician, an informative interview, a correct diagnosis and indication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BGE 133 I 58 ff.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In these palliative care guidelines, psychological and existential suffering were designated as possible indications, associated with a clear lack of precise definitions of the respective terms.

    “As possible indications in these guidelines were designated psychological and existential suffering associated with a clear lack of precise definitions of the respective terms (18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Schildmann, 2014, Palliative sedation therapy: a systematic literature review and critical appraisal of available guidance on indication and decision making, J Palliat Med. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    In case of impaired judgement in relation to the mental disorder, there are high hurdles for compulsory treatments of mentally ill persons.

    “Also, in case of impaired judgement in relation to the mental disorder there are high hurdles for compulsory treatments of mentally ill persons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Only the first two prerequisites (capacity of judgement and autonomous will) have a legal basis; the other two (severe suffering and consideration of alternatives) are not found in the law and are non-binding requirements issued by a private organization.

    “However, it is important to highlight that only the first two prerequisites have a legal basis (capacity of judgement and autonomous will); the other two (severe suffering and consideration of alternatives) are not found in the law or the relevant regulations; they are from a mere legal perspective non-binding requirements, issued by a private organization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Multidisciplinary assessments would help avoid biases and blind spots of mono-disciplinary assessments.

    “Multidisciplinary assessments would help to avoid biases and blind spots of a mono-disciplinary assessments.”
    • Also stated in: § Practical Implications · hedged
      “Also the multidisciplinary proceeding would help to avoid biases and blind spots of a mono-disciplinary assessment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Vandenberghe proposed a long and elaborate exploration and evaluation process in psychiatric illness, including in cases of non-terminal illness, and a committee-based multidisciplinary evaluation before assisted suicide.

    “Vandenberghe (20) proposed in this line a long and elaborate exploration and evaluation process in psychiatric illness, including in cases of non-terminal illness, a committee-based multidisciplinary evaluation before assisted suicide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Vandenberghe, 2018, Physician-assisted suicide and psychiatric illness, New Engl J Med. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The assessment of 'severe suffering' contains room for interpretation when there are no points of reference using algorithms or statistical tools.

    “Also the assessment of “severe suffering” on contains room for interpretation when there are no points of reference using algorithms or statistical tools.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    As social conditions change, the end-of-life-wish may change as well-or endure.

    “As social conditions change, the end-of-life-wish may change as well—or endure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The wish of assisted suicide has become a social reality for a substantial proportion of the population, including-to a certain extent-persons with a mental illness.

    “The wish of assisted suicide has become a social reality for a substantial proportion of the population, including—to a certain extend—persons with a mental illness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In case of doubt, it must be assumed that the person has capacity of judgement.

    “In case of doubt, it must therefore be assumed that the person has capacity of judgement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Persons with mental illness asking for assisted suicide could be unable to finance an assessment lege artis and would therefore be deprived of the possibility granted to more financially backed peers or would have to resort to assessors without the above mentioned claims to standards.

    “Persons with mental illness asking for assisted suicide on the other hand could be unable to finance an assessment lege artis and would thereof be deprived of the possibility granted to more financially backed peers or would have to resort to assessors without the above mentioned claims to standards.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The expert's financial motives only become selfish if professionals claim earnings significantly above the scope of the market norm, without any specific reason to do so.

    “The expert's financial motives only then become selfish, if professionals claim earnings significantly above the scope of the market norm, without any specific reason to do so.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Häring, 2017, Fünf Mythen über Suizidhilfeorganisationen Jusletter, 8 Mai

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    If compensation is based on the expert's administrative costs and expenses or if customary professional wages or fees are demanded, this is not to be considered as selfish motives within the meaning of art. 115.

    “From a legal point of view it was stated, that if the compensation is based on the expert's administrative costs and expenses or if customary professional wages or fees are demanded, this is not to be considered as selfish motives within the meaning of art. 115 (7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Häring, 2017, Fünf Mythen über Suizidhilfeorganisationen Jusletter, 8 Mai

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A multidisciplinary proceeding would help reduce personal beliefs and motivations for action.

    “This procedure would help reduce personal beliefs and motivations for action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Multi-person assessments would minimize the possibility of simplifying irrevocable decisions about life and death and the consequences thereof.

    “The multi-person assessments would also minimize the possibility of simplifying irrevocable decisions about life and death and the consequences thereof.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People who are given the option of a safe and 'soft' assisted suicide find new strength for their current situation.

    “It can be observed that people who are given the option of a safe and “soft” assisted suicide find new strength for their current situation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The exercise of fundamental rights must be possible for all persons to the same extent, regardless of their financial resources.

    “The exercise of fundamental rights must be possible for all persons to the same extent, regardless of their financial resources.”
    “The exercise of fundamental rights must be possible for all persons to the same extent, regardless of their financial resources.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethical commentary frequently emphasises that eligibility for MAiD MD-SUMC must not be confounded by socio-economic inequities or lack of access to care.

    “Ethical commentary frequently emphasises that eligibility for MAiD MD-SUMC must not be confounded by socio-economic inequities or lack of access to care.”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Practical Implications section (page unavailable) says that people unable to pay for an assessment could be deprived of access available to wealthier peers, supporting the concern about socio-economic inequity. It discusses continuing care and maximizing offers of help, but does not say that eligibility must not be confounded by a lack of access to care. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • 2004 guidelines described as still valid after approval of a replacement

    Minor

    The paper says the 2004 guidelines are still valid for professional law, but earlier says the FMH approved a new version in May 2022 to replace the 2004 version in its Code of Professional Conduct.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Häring, 2017, Fünf Mythen über Suizidhilfeorganisationen Jusletter, 8 Mai
  2. 2018, Richtlinien: Umgang mit Sterben und Tod
  3. 2019, Urteilsfähigkeit in der medizinischen.
  4. Bosshard, 2005, Urteilsfähigkeit von Menschen mit psychischen Störungen und Suizidbeihilfe, Schweizerische Juristen-Zeitung., 101, 53
  5. Saß, 1991, Forensische Erheblichkeit seelischer Störungen im psychopathologischen Referenzsystem Medizinrecht—Psychopathologie—Rechtsmedizin., 266

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hachtel, H., Häring, D., Kochuparackal, T., Graf, M., & Vogel, T.
Affiliations
Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Hachtel, Henning
  • Häring, Daniel
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2022-07-07
Volume
13
Pages
909194-909194
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4284882057
Cited by
12
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
assisted dying, assisted suicide, mental illness, medical expert assessment, medical ethics, self-determination, multidisciplinary assessment, assessment standards, Switzerland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review