Cited by 15Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyResilience and Mental HealthPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temperament and character dimensions explain self-reported resilience deficits in patients with affective disorders

Abstract

This is the first study exploring how temperament and character personality dimensions impact self-reported resilience in major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). We included 130 euthymic patients with affective disorders (AFD; 66 MDD and 64 BD) and 134 healthy controls (HC). Connor and Davidson resilience scale and Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-140) were administered. Multiple linear regressions and interaction analyses were performed. Mediation analyses examined if personality dimensions explained group differences in resilience. Resilience was lower in MDD and BD vs. HC and in MDD vs. BD, adjusting for sex, age and education. Higher resilience was predicted by lower harm avoidance (HA) and higher persistence (P) in AFD and MDD, lower HA in BD and higher P and self-directedness (SD) in HC. However, only HA and P had a group-specific effect on resilience in AFD vs. HC. In mediation analyses, specific TCI dimensions at least partially explained differences in resilience: HA, P and SD in AFD or MDD vs. HC; SD in BD vs. HC; P in BD vs. MDD. Concludingly, two temperament traits (HA, P) and a character trait (SD) predict resilience in AFD. Focusing on personality could identify sources of compromised resilience as potential treatment targets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yic.0000000000000483

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tsigkaropoulou, E., Michopoulos, I., Porichi, E., Dafnas, K., Serretti, A., & Ferentinos, P.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Ferentinos, Panagiotis
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2023-06-12
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
59-69
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381716413
Cited by
15
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
resilience, temperament, character, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, mood disorders, harm avoidance, persistence, self-direction, Temperament and Character Inventory, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, personality traits, mediation
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Humans, Personality Inventory, Temperament, Resilience, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review