The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New frontiers in biologging science
Open accessAbstract
The term ‘biologging’ refers to the use of miniaturized animal-attached tags for logging and/or relaying of data about an animal's movements, behaviour, physiology and/or environment. Biologging technology substantially extends our abilities to observe, and take measurements from, free-ranging, undisturbed subjects, providing much scope for advancing both basic and applied biological research. Here, we review highlights from the third international conference on biologging science, which was held in California, USA, from 1 to 5 September 2008. Over the last few years, considerable progress has been made with a range of recording technologies as well as with the management, visualization, integration and analysis of increasingly large and complex biologging datasets. Researchers use these techniques to study animal biology with an unprecedented level of detail and across the full range of ecological scales—from the split-second decision making of individuals to the long-term dynamics of populations, and even entire communities. We conclude our report by suggesting some directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research
Tomkiewicz, S. M., Fuller, M. R., Kie, J. G., & Bates, K. K. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0090 · Cited by 528
Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research
Williams, H. J., Taylor, L. A., Benhamou, S., Bijleveld, A. I., Clay, T. A., de Grissac, S., Demšar, U., English, H. M., Franconi, N., Gómez‐Laich, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13094 · Cited by 333
Self-citationHalsey, L. G., Shepard, E. L. C., & Wilson, R. P. (2011) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.09.002 · Cited by 287
A standardisation framework for bio‐logging data to advance ecological research and conservation
Sequeira, A. M. M., O'Toole, M., Keates, T. R., McDonnell, L. H., Braun, C. D., Hoenner, X., Jaine, F. R. A., Jonsen, I. D., Newman, P., Pye, J., et al. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13593 · Cited by 87
Self-citationWijers, M., Trethowan, P., Markham, A., du Preez, B., Chamaillé-Jammes, S., Loveridge, A., & Macdonald, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00171 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutz, C., & Hays, G. C.
- Venue
- Biology Letters
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2009-03-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-292
- ISSN
- 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-957X
- OpenAlex
- W2134182643
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New frontiers in biologging science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0089
- The paper
- Rutz, C., & Hays, G. C. (2009). New frontiers in biologging science. Biology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.