The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies
Open accessAbstract
The application of theoretical models to describe the structure of the types of fibrous network produced by the electrospinning of polymers for use in tissue engineering and a number of other applications is presented. Emphasis is placed on formal analyses of the pore size distribution and porosities that one would encounter with such structures and the nature of their relationships with other structural characteristics likely to be important for the performance of nanofibrous materials. The theoretical structures considered result from interactions between randomly placed straight rods that represent fibres with nanoscale dimensions. The dominant role of fibre diameter in controlling the pore diameter of the networks is shown and we discuss the perhaps counter-intuitive finding that at a given network mass per unit area and porosity, increasing fibre diameter results in an increase in mean pore radius. Larger pores may be required for ingrowth of cells to nanofibrous networks, hence this study clarifies that simply making the diameters of the fibres smaller might not be the way to improve cell proliferation on such substrates. An extensive review of structural features of the network such as the distribution of mass, inter-fibre contacts and available surface for cell attachment, fibre contact distributions for integrity of the networks and the porosity and pore size distributions is given, with emphasis placed on nanofibre dimensions for the first time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Improved Cellular Infiltration in Electrospun Fiber via Engineered Porosity
Nam, J., Huang, Y., Agarwal, S., & Lannutti, J. (2007) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0306 · Cited by 414
Rnjak-Kovacina, J., Wise, S. G., Li, Z., Maitz, P. K. M., Young, C. J., Wang, Y., & Weiss, A. S. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.065 · Cited by 323
Controlling the porosity of fibrous scaffolds by modulating the fiber diameter and packing density
Soliman, S., Sant, S., Nichol, J. W., Khabiry, M., Traversa, E., & Khademhosseini, A. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.33010 · Cited by 305
Ekaputra, A. K., Prestwich, G. D., Cool, S. M., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2008) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm800565u · Cited by 253
Complete glutaraldehyde elimination during chitosan hydrogel drying by SC-CO2 processing
Baldino, L., Concilio, S., Cardea, S., De Marco, I., & Reverchon, E. (2015) · The Journal of Supercritical Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2015.04.020 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Eichhorn, S. J., & Sampson, W. W.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2005-05-18
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309-318
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- OpenAlex
- W2122318059
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsif.2005.0039
- The paper
- Eichhorn, S. J., & Sampson, W. W. (2005). Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.