Cited by 305Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSilk-based biomaterials and applications

Controlling the porosity of fibrous scaffolds by modulating the fiber diameter and packing density

Soliman, Sherif, Sant, Shilpa, Nichol, Jason W., Khabiry, Masoud, Traversa, Enrico, Khademhosseini, Ali·2011·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Porosity has been shown to be a key determinant of the success of tissue engineered scaffolds. A high degree of porosity and an appropriate pore size are necessary to provide adequate space for cell spreading and migration as well as to allow for proper exchange of nutrients and waste between the scaffold and the surrounding environment. Electrospun scaffolds offer an attractive approach for mimicking the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) for tissue engineering applications. The efficacy of electrospinning is likely to depend on the interaction between cells and the geometric features and physicochemical composition of the scaffold. A major problem in electrospinning is the tendency of fibers to accumulate densely, resulting in poor porosity and small pore size. The porosity and pore sizes in the electrospun scaffolds are mainly dependent on the fiber diameter and their packing density. Here we report a method of modulating porosity in three dimensional (3D) scaffolds by simultaneously tuning the fiber diameter and the fiber packing density. Nonwoven poly(ε‐caprolactone) mats were formed by electrospinning under various conditions to generate sparse or highly dense micro‐ and nanofibrous scaffolds and characterized for their physicochemical and biological properties. We found that microfibers with low packing density resulted in improved cell viability, proliferation and infiltration compared to tightly packed scaffolds. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A:, 2011.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.33010

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soliman, S., Sant, S., Nichol, J. W., Khabiry, M., Traversa, E., & Khademhosseini, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Khademhosseini, Ali
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-10
Volume
96A
Issue
3
Pages
566-574
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W1978834091
Cited by
305
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
electrospun scaffolds, porosity, fiber diameter, fiber packing density, polycaprolactone, nanofibers, microfibers, pore size, cell viability, cell proliferation, cell infiltration, tissue engineering scaffolds, extracellular matrix mimicry
MeSH terms
Cell Survival, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Umbilical Veins, Porosity, Tissue Engineering, Endothelial Cells, Cell Shape, Cell Proliferation, Tissue Scaffolds, Mechanical Phenomena, Nanofibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review