Computational modelling of T-cell formation kinetics: output regulated by initial proliferation-linked deferral of developmental competence
Open accessAbstract
Bone-marrow-derived progenitors must continually enter the thymus of an adult mouse to sustain T-cell homeostasis, yet only a few input cells per day are sufficient to support a yield of 5 × 107 immature T-cells per day and an eventual output of 1–2 × 106 mature cells per day. While substantial progress has been made to delineate the developmental pathway of T-cell lineage commitment, still little is known about the relationship between differentiation competence and the remarkable expansion of the earliest (DN1 stage) T-cell progenitors. To address this question, we developed computational models where the probability to progress to the next stage (DN2) is related to division number. To satisfy differentiation kinetics and overall cell yield data, our models require that adult DN1 cells divide multiple times before becoming competent to progress into DN2 stage. Our findings were subsequently tested by in vitro experiments, where putative early and later-stage DN1 progenitors from the thymus were purified and their progression into DN2 was measured. These experiments showed that the two DN1 sub-populations divided with similar rates, but progressed to the DN2 stage with different rates, thus providing experimental evidence that DN1 cells increase their commitment probability in a cell-intrinsic manner as they undergo cell division. Proliferation-linked shifts in eligibility of DN1 cells to undergo specification thus control kinetics of T-cell generation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Population dynamic models imply that the stages when PU.1 is expressed occupy a minimum of 7-10 intrathymic cell divisions of pro-T cells.
“Population dynamic models imply that the stages when PU.1 is expressed occupy a minimum of 7–10 intrathymic cell divisions of pro-T cells (39, 66, 67).”
From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [67]
The Results (§2.3.3) report that, in the models, adult mouse DN1 cells began committing to DN2 after seven or ten divisions. The paper does not connect those divisions to PU.1 expression or establish a minimum duration for all stages in which PU.1 is expressed. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThese stages span multiple cell cycles in vivo and in vitro.
“These stages span multiple cell cycles in vivo and in vitro (33, 39, 67, 124).”
From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [67]
Additional factors probably collaborate with PU.1 to fine-tune the responses of Mef2c and Lmo2, because they are already declining by the end of ETP stage, multiple cell cycles before DN2b stage when PU.1 itself declines.
“Additional factors also probably collaborate with PU.1 to fine-tune the responses of Mef2c and Lmo2, for they are already declining by the end of ETP stage, multiple cell cycles before DN2b stage when PU.1 itself declines (65, 67, 84, 121, 124) (Figure 8A).”
From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [67]
The Discussion describes division-linked changes in DN1 cells’ competence to progress to DN2, but does not address Mef2c or Lmo2 expression or PU.1’s decline. Searches for those factors and the claimed ETP-to-DN2b timing found no passage in our copy that verifies the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Zhang, J. A., Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., Wold, B. J., & Rothenberg, E. V. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.056 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citationPorritt, H. E., Gordon, K., & Petrie, H. T. (2003) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20030837 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- [1]Rothenberg EV, Moore JE, Yui MA. 2008. Launching the T-cell-lineage developmental programme. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 9–21 10.1038/nri2232 (doi:10.1038/nri2232) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [2]Love PE, Bhandoola A. 2011. Signal integration and crosstalk during thymocyte migration and emigration. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 469–477 10.1038/nri2989 (doi:10.1038/nri2989) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [3]Petrie HT, Zúñiga-Pflücker JC. 2007. Zoned out: functional mapping of stromal ING microenvironments in the thymus. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 649–679 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115715 (doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115715) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Cai AQ, Landman KA, Hughes BD, Witt CM. 2007. T cell development in the thymus: from periodic seeding to constant output. J. Theor. Biol. 249, 384–394 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.028 (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [5]Thomas-Vaslin V, Altes HK, de Boer RJ, Klatzmann D. 2008. Comprehensive assessment and mathematical modeling of T cell population dynamics and homeostasis. J. Immunol. 180, 2240–2250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6]Souza e Silva H, Savino W, Feijoo RA, Vasconcelos ATR. 2009. A cellular automata-based mathematical model for thymocyte development. PLoS ONE 43, e823. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008233 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008233) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [7]Bocharov G, et al. 2011. Feedback regulation of proliferation vs. differentiation rates explains the dependence of CD4 Tcell expansion on precursor number. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3318–3323 10.1073/pnas.1019706108 (doi:10.1073/pnas.1019706108) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [8]Grossman Z, Min B, Meier-Schellersheim M, Paul WE. 2004. Concomitant regulation of T-cell activation and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 387–395 10.1038/nri1355 (doi:10.1038/nri1355) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [9]Sambandam A, Maillard I, Zediak VP, Xu L, Gerstein RM, Aster JC, Pear WS, Bhandoola A. 2005. Notch signaling controls the generation and differentiation of early T lineage progenitors. Nat. Immunol. 6, 663–670 10.1038/ni1216 (doi:10.1038/ni1216) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [10]Thompson PK, Zúñiga-Pflücker JC. 2011. On becoming a T cell, a convergence of factors kick it up a Notch along the way. Semin. Immunol. 23, 350–359 10.1016/j.smim.2011.08.007 (doi:10.1016/j.smim.2011.08.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [12]Lu M, et al. 2005. The earliest thymic progenitors in adults are restricted to T, NK, and dendritic cell lineage and have a potential to form more diverse TCRbeta chains than fetal progenitors. J. Immunol. 175, 5848–5856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13]Martins VC, et al. 2012. Thymus-autonomous T cell development in the absence of progenitor import. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1409–1417 10.1084/jem.20120846 (doi:10.1084/jem.20120846) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [14]Peaudecerf L, et al. 2012. Thymocytes may persist and differentiate without any input from bone marrow progenitors. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1401–1408 10.1084/jem.20120845 (doi:10.1084/jem.20120845) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [15]Foss D, Donskoy E, Goldschneider I. 2002. Functional demonstration of intrathymic binding sites and microvascular gates for prothymocytes in irradiated mice. Int. Immunol. 13, 331–338 10.1093/intimm/14.3.331 (doi:10.1093/intimm/14.3.331) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [16]Goldschneider I, Komschlies KL, Greiner DL. 1986. Studies of thymocytopoiesis in rats and mice. I. Kinetics of appearance of thymocytes using a direct intrathymic adoptive transfer assay for thymocyte precursors. J. Exp. Med. 163, 1–17 10.1084/jem.163.1.1 (doi:10.1084/jem.163.1.1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [17]O'Reilly LA, Harris AW. 1997. bcl-2 transgene expression promotes survival and reduces proliferation of CD3-CD4-CD8- T cell progenitors. Int. Immunol. 9, 1291–1301 10.1093/intimm/9.9.1291 (doi:10.1093/intimm/9.9.1291) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [18]Vasseur F, Campion AL, Pénit C. 2011. Scheduled kinetics of cell proliferation and phenotypic changes during immature thymocyte generation. Eur J. Immunol. 31, 3038–3047 10.1002/1521-4141(2001010)31:10<3038::AID-IMMU3038>3.0.CO;2-3 (doi:10.1002/1521-4141(2001010)31:10<3038::AID-IMMU3038>3.0.CO;2-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [19]Lai JCY, Wlodarska M, Liu DJ, Abraham N, Johnson P. 2010. CD45 regulates migration, proliferation, and progression of double negative 1 thymocytes. J. Immunol. 185, 2059–2070 10.4049/jimmunol.0902693 (doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0902693) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [20]Luc S, et al. 2012. The earliest thymic T cell progenitors sustain B cell and myeloid lineage potential. Nat. Immunol. 13, 412–419 10.1038/ni.2255 (doi:10.1038/ni.2255) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [21]Tan JB, Visan I, Yuan JS, Guidos CJ. 2005. Requirement for Notch1 signals at sequential early stages of intrathymic T cell development. Nat. Immunol. 6, 671–679 10.1038/ni1217 (doi:10.1038/ni1217) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [22]Schmitt TM, Zúñiga-Pflücker JC. 2006. T-cell development, doing it in a dish. Immunol. Rev. 209, 95–102 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00353.x (doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00353.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [23]Heinzel K, Benz C, Martins VC, Haidl ID, Bleul CC. 2007. Bone marrow-derived hemopoietic precursors commit to the T cell lineage only after arrival in the thymic microenvironment. J. Immunol. 178, 858–868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24]Ceredig R, Bosco N, Rolink AG. 2007. The B lineage potential of thymus settling progenitors is critically dependent on mouse age. Eur J. Immunol. 37, 830–837 10.1002/eji.200636728 (doi:10.1002/eji.200636728) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [25]Newport J, Kirschner M. 1982. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30, 675–686 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0 (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [26]Temple S, Raff MC. 1986. Clonal analysis of oligodendrocyte development in culture: evidence for a developmental clock that counts cell divisions. Cell 44, 773–779 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90843-3 (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90843-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [27]Raff M. 2007. Intracellular developmental timers. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 72, 431–435 10.1101/sqb.2007.72.007 (doi:10.1101/sqb.2007.72.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [28]Wells J, Lee B, Cai AQ, Karapetyan A, Lee W-J, Rugg E, Sinha S, Nie Q, Dai X. 2009. Ovol2 suppresses cell cycling and terminal differentiation of keratinocytes by directly repressing c-Myc and Notch1. J. Biol. Chem. 2845, 29 125–29 135 10.1074/jbc.M109.008847 (doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.008847) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development
Rothenberg, E. V., Hosokawa, H., & Ungerbäck, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00228 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationChamphekar, A., Damle, S. S., Freedman, G., Carotta, S., Nutt, S. L., & Rothenberg, E. V. (2015) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.259879.115 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Manesso, E., Chickarmane, V., Kueh, H. Y., Rothenberg, E. V., & Peterson, C.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Carsten
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2013-01-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 78
- Pages
- 20120774-20120774
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- PMC
- PMC3565808
- OpenAlex
- W2039422895
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI095943, AI095943)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Keywords
- T cell development, thymus, developmental competence, cell division, T cell homeostasis, lineage commitment, computational modelling, cell proliferation, thymic selection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Division, Computer Simulation, Kinetics, T-Lymphocytes, Thymus Gland, Models, Immunological, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review