Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Three-dimensional kinematics and the origin of the hominin walking stride

O'Neill, Matthew C., Demes, Brigitte, Thompson, Nathan E., Umberger, Brian R.·2018·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

Humans are unique among apes and other primates in the musculoskeletal design of their lower back and pelvis. While the last common ancestor of the Pan–Homo lineages has long been thought to be ‘African ape-like’, including in its lower back and ilia design, recent descriptions of early hominin and Miocene ape fossils have led to the proposal that its lower back and ilia were more similar to those of some Old World monkeys, such as macaques. Here, we compared three-dimensional kinematics of the pelvis and hind/lower limbs of bipedal macaques, chimpanzees and humans walking at similar dimensionless speeds to test the effects of lower back and ilia design on gait. Our results indicate that locomotor kinematics of bipedal macaques and chimpanzees are remarkably similar, with both species exhibiting greater pelvis motion and more flexed, abducted hind limbs than humans during walking. Some differences between macaques and chimpanzees in pelvis tilt and hip abduction were noted, but they were small in magnitude; larger differences were observed in ankle flexion. Our results suggest that if Pan and Homo diverged from a common ancestor whose lower back and ilia were either ‘African ape-like’ or more ‘Old World monkey-like’, at its origin, the hominin walking stride likely involved distinct (i.e. non-human-like) pelvis motion on flexed, abducted hind limbs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2018.0205

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distinct kinematic features of human bipedal walking that contribute to enhanced economy include extended hip and knee joints, narrow step widths, and heel-first foot strike postures.

    “The distinct kinematic features of human bipedal walking that contribute to this enhanced economy include the use of extended hip and knee joints, narrow step widths, and heel-first foot strike postures (O'Neill, Demes, Thompson, & Umberger, 2018; Pontzer, Raichlen, & Sockol, 2009; Thompson, O'Neill, Holowka, & Demes, 2018; Webber & Raichlen, 2016).”

    From Forest terrains influence walking kinematics among indigenous Tsimane of the Bolivian Amazon (2022) · cites this paper as O'Neill et al., 2018

    Section 3.2 reports that humans walk with more extended hips and knees than the compared chimpanzees and macaques. Section 4.3 says greater lower-limb extension may lower walking’s metabolic cost, and section 4.1 describes a distinct human heel-strike posture. The paper does not establish narrow step width or heel-first foot strike as contributors to enhanced economy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Schultz AH, 1961, Vertebral column and thorax, Primatologia, 4, 1
  2. 10.1002/ajpa.1330920306 · DOI
  3. McCollum MA, 2010, The vertebral formula of the last common ancestor of African apes and humans, J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.), 314, 123, 10.1002/jez.b.21316 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nature04008 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature06113 · DOI
  6. Washburn SL, 1974, Ape into man
  7. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0010 · DOI
  8. Wrangham R, 2001, All apes great and small, vol. 1: African apes, 5
  9. 10.1126/science.1175831 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1175832 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1175833 · DOI
  12. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0112 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/ncomms8717 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1403659111 · DOI
  15. 10.7717/peerj.1521 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.1511220112 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/evan.21437 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/ajpa.22997 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/ajpa.23035 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.03.009 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1103094 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.03.002 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.1420275111 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/379156a0 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:3<87::AID-EVAN3>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.178.4063.877 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.012 · DOI
  28. Robinson JT, 1972, Early hominid posture and locomotion
  29. 10.1002/ajpa.1330550203 · DOI
  30. Lovejoy CO, 2005, The natural history of human gait and posture part 1: spine and pelvis, Gait Posture, 21, 95
  31. 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00290.x · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.04.004 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.11.009 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0047-2484(79)90057-5 · DOI
  35. Yamazaki N, 1985, Primate morphophysiology, locomotor analyses, and human bipedalism, 105
  36. Okada M, 1985, Primate morphophysiology, locomotor analyses, and human bipedalism, 47
  37. 10.1002/jezb.21451 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.011 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/ar.23557 · DOI
  40. 10.1109/10.102791 · DOI
  41. 10.1242/jeb.079665 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/ajpa.20986 · DOI
  43. 10.1115/1.2895496 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00017-C · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00083-7 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/jor.1100080310 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00158-4 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.10.002 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.04.004 · DOI
  52. 10.1152/physrev.1989.69.4.1199 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Kram R, 1997, Effect of reduced gravity on the preferred walk-run transition speed, J. Exp. Biol., 200, 821, 10.1242/jeb.200.4.821 · DOI
  54. Hammond AS, 2017, Lower ilium evolution in apes and hominins, Ant. Rec., 300, 282
  55. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.05.012 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/evan.10133 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/scientificamerican1188-118 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1002/ajpa.22440 · DOI
  59. 10.1002/ajpa.1330200109 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/ajpa.1330960105 · DOI
  61. 10.1098/rsif.2012.0026 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.12.002 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/ajpa.10112 · DOI
  64. Ogihara N, 2005, Kinematic analysis of bipedal locomotion of a Japanese macaque that lost its forearms due to congenital malformation, Primates, 46, 11
  65. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.005 · DOI
  66. 10.1115/1.1392310 · DOI
  67. 10.1002/ajpa.10408 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Neill, M. C., Demes, B., Thompson, N. E., & Umberger, B. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anatomy, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA
  • Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
  • Department of Anatomy, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA
  • School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2013, USA
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2018-08
Volume
15
Issue
145
Pages
20180205
ISSN
  • 1742-5689
  • 1742-5662
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS 0935321, BCS 0935327)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review