Cited by 9Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inferring kinetic parameters of oscillatory gene regulation from single cell time-series data

Open access
Burton, Joshua, Manning, Cerys S., Rattray, Magnus, Papalopulu, Nancy, Kursawe, Jochen·2021·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Gene expression dynamics, such as stochastic oscillations and aperiodic fluctuations, have been associated with cell fate changes in multiple contexts, including development and cancer. Single cell live imaging of protein expression with endogenous reporters is widely used to observe such gene expression dynamics. However, the experimental investigation of regulatory mechanisms underlying the observed dynamics is challenging, since these mechanisms include complex interactions of multiple processes, including transcription, translation and protein degradation. Here, we present a Bayesian method to infer kinetic parameters of oscillatory gene expression regulation using an auto-negative feedback motif with delay. Specifically, we use a delay-adapted nonlinear Kalman filter within a Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm to identify posterior probability distributions. Our method can be applied to time-series data on gene expression from single cells and is able to infer multiple parameters simultaneously. We apply it to published data on murine neural progenitor cells and show that it outperforms alternative methods. We further analyse how parameter uncertainty depends on the duration and time resolution of an imaging experiment, to make experimental design recommendations. This work demonstrates the utility of parameter inference on time course data from single cells and enables new studies on cell fate changes and population heterogeneity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2021.0393

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1126/science.1242366 · DOI
  2. Manning CS et al. 2019 Quantitative single-cell live imaging links HES5 dynamics with cell-state and fate in murine neurogenesis. Nat. Commun. 27, 1-19. (doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10734-8) · DOI
  3. 10.15252/embj.2019103558 · DOI
  4. 10.1242/dev.147256 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/gtc.12009 · DOI
  6. Kobayashi T, Kageyama R. 2014 Current topics in developmental biology, 1st edn, vol. 110. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc, pp. 263-283.
  7. 10.1126/science.1218351 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.7554/eLife.16118 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/msb4100110 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1420404112 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ncomms4399 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00494-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00534-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.006 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008729 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.023 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/jcp.21943 · DOI
  18. 10.1242/dev.021923 · DOI
  19. 10.3390/pr8020166 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nprot.2014.025 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1098/rsif.2017.0237 · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rsif.2018.0943 · DOI
  23. 10.1098/rsif.2020.0652 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01659-X · DOI
  25. 10.1186/s13059-017-1297-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s13059-016-0930-3 · DOI
  27. 10.1098/rsif.2018.0967 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt111 · DOI
  29. 10.1214/13-AOAS669 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1216379 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ramachandra Murthy K, Singh S, Tuck D, Varadan V. 2019 Handbook of statistics, 1st edn, vol. 40, pp. 355-404. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  32. 10.1093/genetics/162.4.2025 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01010.x · DOI
  34. 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Hoffman MD, Gelman A. 2014 The no-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1593-1623.
  36. 10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X · DOI
  37. Betancourt M. 2017 A conceptual introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv 1701.02434. · DOI
  38. 10.2307/3318418 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/s00180-012-0352-y · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kojima K Fujita A Shimamura T Imoto S Miyano S. 2008 Estimation of nonlinear gene regulatory networks via L1 regularized NVAR from time series gene expression data. In Genome informatics Int. Conf. on Genome Informatics vol. 20 pp. 37–51. London UK: Imperial College Press. · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bib/bbv015 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/gr.1262503 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.5334/jors.252 · DOI
  45. 10.1186/s12859-017-1695-8 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty782 · DOI
  47. 10.1242/dev.01436 · DOI
  48. 10.1063/1.481811 · DOI
  49. 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021909 · DOI
  50. 10.1063/1.4867786 · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.1074560 · DOI
  52. 10.1096/fasebj.11.11.9285481 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1198/106186002808 · DOI
  54. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. 2006 Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  55. Pedregosa F et al. 2011 Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825-2830.
  56. 10.1098/rsos.190747 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.013 · DOI
  58. Zhuang K, Zhu H. 2010 Stability and bifurcation analysis in a model of Hes1 selfregulation with time delay. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 43, 469-471.
  59. 10.1126/science.280.5363.585 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1038/nmeth.1253 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.017 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.tig.2020.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104637 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s11222-008-9110-y · DOI
  65. 10.1214/ss/1015346320 · DOI
  66. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479 · DOI
  67. Mönke G Sorgenfrei FA Schmal C Granada AE. 2020 Optimal time frequency analysis for biological data - pyBOAT. bioRxiv 2020.04.29.067744. (doi:10.1101/2020.04.29.067744) · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s00294-016-0661-8 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1126/science.1070919 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1038/s41540-017-0020-5 · DOI
  71. Burton J Manning CS Rattray M Papalopulu N Kursawe J. 2021 Inferring kinetic parameters of oscillatory gene regulation from single cell time-series data. Figshare. (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6306843) · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Burton, J., Manning, C. S., Rattray, M., Papalopulu, N., & Kursawe, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Papalopulu, Nancy
  • Kursawe, Jochen
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2021-09
Volume
18
Issue
182
Pages
20210393-20210393
ISSN
1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204681423
Cited by
9
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (090868/Z/09/Z, 103986/Z/14/Z, 204832/B/16/Z, 219992/Z/19/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
gene expression oscillations, parameter inference, Bayesian inference, time delay, nonlinear Kalman filter, Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm, neural progenitor cells, cell fate, population heterogeneity, parameter uncertainty, experimental design
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Gene Expression Regulation, Kinetics, Probability, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review