The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring kinetic parameters of oscillatory gene regulation from single cell time-series data
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Gene expression dynamics, such as stochastic oscillations and aperiodic fluctuations, have been associated with cell fate changes in multiple contexts, including development and cancer. Single cell live imaging of protein expression with endogenous reporters is widely used to observe such gene expression dynamics. However, the experimental investigation of regulatory mechanisms underlying the observed dynamics is challenging, since these mechanisms include complex interactions of multiple processes, including transcription, translation and protein degradation. Here, we present a Bayesian method to infer kinetic parameters of oscillatory gene expression regulation using an auto-negative feedback motif with delay. Specifically, we use a delay-adapted nonlinear Kalman filter within a Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm to identify posterior probability distributions. Our method can be applied to time-series data on gene expression from single cells and is able to infer multiple parameters simultaneously. We apply it to published data on murine neural progenitor cells and show that it outperforms alternative methods. We further analyse how parameter uncertainty depends on the duration and time resolution of an imaging experiment, to make experimental design recommendations. This work demonstrates the utility of parameter inference on time course data from single cells and enables new studies on cell fate changes and population heterogeneity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. (2021) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/20-ba1221 · Cited by 1,810
Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing
Särkkä, S. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139344203 · Cited by 1,784
Toni, T., Welch, D., Strelkowa, N., Ipsen, A., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0172 · Cited by 1,498
Design principles of biochemical oscillators
Novák, B., & Tyson, J. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2530 · Cited by 1,137
An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits
Alon, U. (2019) · doi:10.1201/9780429283321 · Cited by 955
Gelman, A., Hill, J., & Vehtari, A. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781139161879 · Cited by 613
Parameter estimation and model selection in computational biology
Lillacci, G., & Khammash, M. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000696 · Cited by 325
Pepe-Mooney, B. J., Dill, M. T., Alemany, A., Ordovas-Montanes, J., Matsushita, Y., Rao, A., Sen, A., Miyazaki, M., Anakk, S., Dawson, P. A., et al. (2019) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.04.004 · Cited by 266
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- 10.1126/science.1242366 · DOI
- Manning CS et al. 2019 Quantitative single-cell live imaging links HES5 dynamics with cell-state and fate in murine neurogenesis. Nat. Commun. 27, 1-19. (doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10734-8) · DOI
- 10.15252/embj.2019103558 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.147256 · DOI
- 10.1111/gtc.12009 · DOI
- Kobayashi T, Kageyama R. 2014 Current topics in developmental biology, 1st edn, vol. 110. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc, pp. 263-283.
- 10.1126/science.1218351 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.16118 · DOI
- 10.1038/msb4100110 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1420404112 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms4399 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00494-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00534-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008729 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.023 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcp.21943 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.021923 · DOI
- 10.3390/pr8020166 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2014.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rsif.2017.0237 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2018.0943 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2020.0652 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01659-X · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-017-1297-9 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-016-0930-3 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2018.0967 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt111 · DOI
- 10.1214/13-AOAS669 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1216379 · DOI · Paper page
- Ramachandra Murthy K, Singh S, Tuck D, Varadan V. 2019 Handbook of statistics, 1st edn, vol. 40, pp. 355-404. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
- 10.1093/genetics/162.4.2025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01010.x · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoffman MD, Gelman A. 2014 The no-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1593-1623.
- 10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X · DOI
- Betancourt M. 2017 A conceptual introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv 1701.02434. · DOI
- 10.2307/3318418 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00180-012-0352-y · DOI · Paper page
- Kojima K Fujita A Shimamura T Imoto S Miyano S. 2008 Estimation of nonlinear gene regulatory networks via L1 regularized NVAR from time series gene expression data. In Genome informatics Int. Conf. on Genome Informatics vol. 20 pp. 37–51. London UK: Imperial College Press. · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbv015 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.1262503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5334/jors.252 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-017-1695-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty782 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.01436 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.481811 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021909 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4867786 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1074560 · DOI
- 10.1096/fasebj.11.11.9285481 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1198/106186002808 · DOI
- Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. 2006 Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Pedregosa F et al. 2011 Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825-2830.
- 10.1098/rsos.190747 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.013 · DOI
- Zhuang K, Zhu H. 2010 Stability and bifurcation analysis in a model of Hes1 selfregulation with time delay. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 43, 469-471.
- 10.1126/science.280.5363.585 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.1253 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2020.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104637 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11222-008-9110-y · DOI
- 10.1214/ss/1015346320 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479 · DOI
- Mönke G Sorgenfrei FA Schmal C Granada AE. 2020 Optimal time frequency analysis for biological data - pyBOAT. bioRxiv 2020.04.29.067744. (doi:10.1101/2020.04.29.067744) · DOI
- 10.1007/s00294-016-0661-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1070919 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41540-017-0020-5 · DOI
- Burton J Manning CS Rattray M Papalopulu N Kursawe J. 2021 Inferring kinetic parameters of oscillatory gene regulation from single cell time-series data. Figshare. (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6306843) · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Burton, J., Manning, C. S., Rattray, M., Papalopulu, N., & Kursawe, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Papalopulu, Nancy
- Kursawe, Jochen
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 182
- Pages
- 20210393-20210393
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8479358
- OpenAlex
- W3204681423
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (090868/Z/09/Z, 103986/Z/14/Z, 204832/B/16/Z, 219992/Z/19/Z)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- gene expression oscillations, parameter inference, Bayesian inference, time delay, nonlinear Kalman filter, Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm, neural progenitor cells, cell fate, population heterogeneity, parameter uncertainty, experimental design
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Gene Expression Regulation, Kinetics, Probability, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review