Cited by 340Fluid Dynamics and Heat TransferParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

The interaction of falling water drops: coalescence

Brazier-Smith, P. R., Jennings, S. G., Latham, J.·1972·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

Experimental studies have been conducted of the interaction of falling water drops of radii R and r (R > r), density p and surface tension σ colliding in air with a relative velocity U and a perpendicular distance X between the centre of one drop and the undeflected trajectory of the other. R and r were varied from 150 to 750 μm, R/r from 1.0 to 2.5, U from 0.3 to 3.0 m s-1 and X from 0 (head-on collisions) to the maximum value for contact, R + r. Four types of interaction were observed: (1) bouncing; (2) permanent coalescence; (3) coalescence followed by separation; (4) coalescence followed by separation and the formation of satellite drops. The principal effort was devoted to a study of the critical conditions under which drops will separate after coalescence. It was found that there was a critical value of X, denoted by Xc, below which the coalesced drops remained united and above which there was sufficient angular momentum for the drops to separate after coalescence. For a wide range of values of r, R and U the coalescence efficiency e = Xe/(R + r)2 was found to lie between 0.1 and 0.4 for drops of identical size and about 0.2 and 0.6 for drops with R/r = 2.0. A theoretical analysis based on energy concepts predicted that the coalescence efficiency is given by the equation where f(R/r) is a function which varies from 1.3 for R/r = 1 and 3.8 for R/r = 3. The predictions of this equation were in excellent agreement with the experimental results over the entire range of conditions studied. Investigations are also described of the critical conditions for the bouncing of colliding drops, the influence of electric charges upon the interactions and the elongation and splitting of a rotating drop.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1972.0016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modeling of droplet collision outcomes has been studied extensively in past decades, for example, the classical O'Rourke model and later improved models.

    “Modeling of droplet collision outcomes has been studied extensively in past decades, for example, the classical O'Rourke model 67 and later improved models, 20,21,68”

    From Droplet collision of hypergolic propellants (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brazier-Smith, P. R., Jennings, S. G., & Latham, J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1972-01-25
Volume
326
Issue
1566
Pages
393-408
ISSN
  • 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9169
OpenAlex
W2145430824
Cited by
340
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Keywords
droplet coalescence, droplet collision, coalescence efficiency, drop separation, satellite drops, angular momentum, drop bouncing, surface tension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review