Cited by 37Fluid Dynamics and Heat TransferPrecipitation Measurement and AnalysisAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Toward a Physical Characterization of Raindrop Collision Outcome Regimes

Open access
Testik, F. Y., Barros, A. P., Bliven, L. F.·2011·Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Abstract

A comprehensive raindrop collision outcome regime diagram that delineates the physical conditions associated with the outcome regimes (i.e., bounce, coalescence, and different breakup types) of binary raindrop collisions is proposed. The proposed diagram builds on a theoretical regime diagram defined in the phase space of collision Weber numbers We and the drop diameter ratio p by including critical angle of impact considerations. In this study, the theoretical regime diagram is first evaluated against a comprehensive dataset for drop collision experiments representative of raindrop collisions in nature. Subsequently, the theoretical regime diagram is modified to explicitly describe the dominant regimes of raindrop interactions in (We, p) by delineating the physical conditions necessary for the occurrence of distinct types of collision-induced breakup (neck/filament, sheet, disk, and crown breakups) based on critical angle of impact consideration. Crown breakup is a subtype of disk breakup for lower collision kinetic energy that presents distinctive morphology. Finally, the experimental results are analyzed in the context of the comprehensive collision regime diagram, and conditional probabilities that can be used in the parameterization of breakup kernels in stochastic models of raindrop dynamics are provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/2010jas3706.1

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Testik's theory, ignoring viscous dissipation and impact parameter, α = β = 1 approximately for the bouncing-coalescence-separation transition; α < 1 for bouncing, α > 1 and β < 1 for coalescence, and β > 1 for separation.

    “In Testik's theory, 26,48 by ignoring the effects of viscous dissipation and the impact parameter, α β = = 1 approximately for the bouncing-coalescence-separation transition, where the two energy ratios divide the We -Δ parameter space into three regimes, with α < 1 for bouncing, α > 1 and β < 1 for coalescence, and β > 1 for separation.”

    From Droplet collision of hypergolic propellants (2024) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Testik et al. found that the theoretical model for bouncing and coalescence regimes still holds for off-center collisions, while neck separation occurred at large B in the coalescence regime.

    “Testik et al.48 found that the theoretical model for the bouncing and coalescence regimes still holds for off-center collisions, while the so-called “neck separation” that occurred at large B was observed in the coalescence regime.”

    From Droplet collision of hypergolic propellants (2024) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Testik, F. Y., Barros, A. P., & Bliven, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Wallops Flight Facility (US)
Venue
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Published
2011-04-01
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
1097-1113
ISSN
  • 0022-4928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0469
OpenAlex
W2076321058
Cited by
37
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Clemson University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
Weber number, filament breakup, sheet breakup, bounce, coalescence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review