Cited by 20Analytical Chemistry and ChromatographyAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materialsPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

Model-independent aspects of tracer chromatography theory

Buffham, B. A.·1973·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract A theory of tracer chromatography is developed on the basis of population balances in the steady state. As well as to tracer systems the theory applies to chromatography with a carrier gas if the system response is linear. It is shown that the time of passage of a tracer peak can properly be taken to be the mean residence time of the tracer and that the mean time is directly related to thermodynamic properties. Many results of chromatography theory may be established easily without the need for the assumptions usually employed. Thus the methods already developed for the chromatographic determination of thermodynamic properties are more powerful, and there is more freedom in the design of experiments, than had been realized. The mean residence time of species i in the steady state is equal to the ratio of the holdup of i in the system to the rate of transmission of i through the system. By invoking the hypothesis that in the steady state the system is in equilibrium with its feed, the mean time can be related to thermodynamic properties contained in an expression for the holdup. This provides a powerful strategy for developing theoretical results without the need for a mathematical model of the chromatographic process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1973.0049

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This robustness is consistent with prior theoretical and experimental studies.

    “This is consistent with prior theoretical and experimental studies (e.g. Glueckauf, 1955; Kucera, 1965; Buffham, 1973, 1984; Villermaux, 1974; Valocchi, 1985; Brusseau, 1992; Brusseau et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buffham, B. A.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Buffham, B. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1973-04-17
Volume
333
Issue
1592
Pages
89-98
ISSN
  • 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9169
OpenAlex
W1965881732
Cited by
20
References
4
Citations by year
2020: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Keywords
population balance, steady state, mean residence time, holdup, linear system response, thermodynamic properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review