The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids
Abstract
This paper describes a study of the adhesion between elastic solids and the effect of roughness in reducing the adhesion. The experiments were carried out between optically smooth rubber spheres and a hard smooth flat surface of Perspex which could be roughened to various degrees. The radius of the rubber spheres was varied by a factor of 8, their elastic modulus by a factor of 10, while the centre line average (c.l.a.)of the roughened Perspex surface was varied from 0.12 to 1.5 μm. The results show that c.l.a. roughnesses which are small compared with the overall deformation occurring at the region of the rubber-Perspex contact can produce an extremely large reduction in adhesion. The effect is more marked for rubbers of higher modulus. On the other hand the curvature of the sphere (over the range examined) has little influence. For this reason and because the analytical problem of a sphere on a rough flat is extremely complicated a theoretical analysis has been developed for the simpler case of a smooth flat in contact with a rough flat surface. As in Greenwood & Williamson (1966) the rough surface is modelled by asperities all of the same radius of curvature and with heights following a Gaussian distribution of standard deviation σ. The overall contact force is obtained by applying the contact theory of Johnson, Kendall & Roberts (1971) to each individual asperity. The theory predicts that the adhesion expressed as a fraction of the maximum value depends upon a single parameter, 1/Δe,which is the ratio between a and the elastic displacement δC that the tip of an asperity can sustain before it pulls off from the other surface. The analysis shows that the adhesion parameter may also be regarded as representing the statistical average of a competition between the compressive forces exerted by the higher asperities trying to prize the surfaces apart and the adhesive forces between the lower asperities trying to hold the surfaces together. Although the theory is derived for two nominally plane surfaces it is found to fit the experimental results for a sphere on a flat reasonably well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fracture and adhesion of soft materials: a review
Creton, C., & Ciccotti, M. (2016) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046601 · Cited by 915
Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces
Persson, B. N. J. (2006) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2006.04.001 · Cited by 759
Fracture mechanics and the adherence of viscoelastic bodies
Maugis, D., & Barquins, M. (1978) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/11/14/011 · Cited by 658
Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: An overview
Vakis, A. I., Yastrebov, V. A., Scheibert, J., Nicola, L., Dini, D., Minfray, C., Almqvist, A., Paggi, M., Lee, S., Limbert, G., et al. (2018) · Tribology International · doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2018.02.005 · Cited by 580
Drechsler, P., & Federle, W. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuller, K. N. G., & Tabor, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1975-09-30
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 1642
- Pages
- 327-342
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W1970182472
- Cited by
- 976
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1975.0138
- The paper
- Fuller, K. N. G., & Tabor, D. (1975). The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1975.0138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.