Cited by 22Differential Equations and Boundary ProblemsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryMathematical and Theoretical Analysis

Contour integrals for the ultrahyperbolic wave equation

Woodhouse, N. M. J.·1992·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

The Penrose transform for the ultrahyperbolic wave equation is related to the problem of specifying data on an initial spacelike 2-plane. It is shown that a smooth solution can always be represented locally by a twistor contour integral formula, and this fact is used to rederive Asgeirsson’s mean value theorem, as well as the classic result that it is not possible to specify arbitrary ‘initial data’ on a non-null 3-plane. The global problem of constructing a twistor transform in the compactified space-time with signature + + - - is also considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1992.0102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Woodhouse (1992) studied the case of two space and two time dimensions with initial data on a spacelike hypersurface of codimension 2, using the Penrose twistor transform in the real case, and recovered the uniqueness result of Courant and its implicit constraints on well-posed initial data for the Cauchy problem.

    “In related and prior work, Woodhouse (1992) studied the case of two space and two time dimensions with initial data on a spacelike hypersurface (thus of codimension 2), using the Penrose twistor transform in the real case. He also recovered the uniqueness result of Courant and its implicit constraints on well-posed inital data for the Cauchy problem.”

    From On determinism and well-posedness in multiple time dimensions (2009) · cites this paper as Woodhouse (1992)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodhouse, N. M. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Woodhouse, N. M. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1992-07-08
Volume
438
Issue
1902
Pages
197-206
ISSN
  • 0962-8444 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9177
OpenAlex
W1987280006
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Differential Equations and Boundary Problems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
Penrose transform, twistor theory, contour integrals, initial data, signature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review