On determinism and well-posedness in multiple time dimensions
Open accessAbstract
We study the initial value problem for the wave equation and the ultrahyperbolic equation for data posed on initial hypersurfaces surface of arbitrary space–time signature. We show that, under a non-local constraint, the initial value problem posed on codimension-one hypersurfaces—the Cauchy problem—has global unique solutions in the Sobolev spaces H m . Thus, it is well-posed. However, we show that the initial value problem on higher codimension hypersurfaces is ill-posed due to failure of uniqueness, at least when specifying a finite number of derivatives of the data. This failure is in contrast to a uniqueness result for data given in an arbitrary neighbourhood of such initial hypersurfaces, which Courant deduces from Asgeirsson’s mean value theorem. We give a generalization of Courant’s theorem that extends to a broader class of equations. The proofs use Fourier synthesis and the Holmgren–John uniqueness theorem.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper studies initial value problems for the wave and ultrahyperbolic equations with multiple time dimensions, showing that the mixed-signature Cauchy problem can be well-posed on Sobolev spaces under an explicit nonlocal constraint. In contrast, initial data on higher-codimension hypersurfaces generally fail uniqueness, even with smooth global solutions and finitely many prescribed derivatives.
Key findings
- The Cauchy problem of mixed signature for the ultrahyperbolic equation is ill-posed in general for \(d_2 \ge 2\), but becomes well-posed on Sobolev spaces \(H^m\) when an explicit nonlocal constraint is imposed. Theorems 2.2–2.3 give unique solutions for data in \(X_S\) forward in \(y_1\), in \(X_U\) backward, and globally for \(X_C\); Corollary 2.4 extends this to higher energy spaces \(X^m\), with classical \(C^2\) solutions when \(m > ((d_1+(d_2-1))/2)+2\).
- For higher-codimension hypersurfaces, solutions are highly nonunique even among smooth \(H^m\) solutions satisfying the constraint. In particular, data on \(M=\{y=0\}\) do not uniquely determine the solution at any other point \(y \in \mathbb{R}^{d_2}\setminus\{0\}\).
- Theorem 4.1 shows that for any \(k\), there exist constraint-satisfying data \(u_0,u_1\) on \(N\) that vanish to order \(k\) on \(M\); hence specifying any finite number of normal derivatives on \(M\) does not restore uniqueness.
- Theorem 5.1 generalizes a Courant uniqueness result: for \(\varepsilon>0\), a \(C^2\) solution whose Cauchy data vanish on an ellipsoid \(Z_\varepsilon \subseteq M\) must vanish on the envelope \(D\), so data in an arbitrarily small ellipsoidal neighborhood determine the solution. The proof uses the Holmgren–John theorem and remains true under perturbations of the equation.
Methods
- Fourier synthesis of the evolution operator, using the dispersion relation and Lyapunov exponent, Plancherel identity, Sobolev spaces \(H^m\), and an indefinite energy functional; defines phase space \(X\) and subspaces \(X_S\), \(X_U\), \(X_C\).
- Constructs extension operators from data on higher-codimension hypersurfaces \(M\) to constraint-satisfying Cauchy data on codimension-one hypersurfaces \(N\), with kernels \(\chi\) supported in \(|\eta'|<|\xi|\), and proves boundedness and energy estimates in Theorems 3.2–3.7.
- Uses the Holmgren–John uniqueness theorem to prove the generalized Courant-type determinacy result, without relying on analyticity of the data or solution.
Limitations
- The paper states that case (iii), specifying infinitely many derivatives on the initial hypersurface \(M\), is not answered.
- The extension operators and resulting global solutions are highly nonunique; this nonuniqueness is central to the higher-codimension failure of determinism.
- For \(d_1=p_1\), it is not possible to extend arbitrary data to satisfy the constraint; one must require \(\pi_2 w_\gamma=0\) for the relevant multi-indices. The results also depend on imposing the nonlocal constraint; without it the Cauchy problem is ill-posed.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 4
If the evolution mapping y1 → (u, ∂y1 u) is in C^1(R_y1 : H^1 × H^0), then the energy is conserved along a solution u(·, y1, ·).
“Theorem 2.1. Suppose that the evolution mapping y 1 → ( u ( x,y 1 ,y ′ ) ∂ y 1 u ( x,y 1 ,y ′ ) ) is in C 1 ( R y 1 : H 1 × H 0 ) . Then the energy is conserved along a solution u ( · , y 1 , · ) :”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. The initial value problem in higher codimension · p. 8
Solutions can be singular for standard classes of data.
“Indeed, we show that solutions can be singular for standard classes of data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 14
For initial data on a lower-dimensional hypersurface M of mixed signature, it is not always possible to extend arbitrary data w=(w0,wα) on M to N so that the well-posedness constraint is satisfied, due to analogous lower-dimensional constraints on M.
“This is not always possible for arbitrary data w = ( w 0 , w α ) posed on M , due to analogous lower dimensional constraints on M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19
Initial data consisting of the values of the solution u(x,y) and its first normal derivatives on M, through the extension procedure, give rise to constraint-satisfying Cauchy data on a codimension-one hypersurface N.
“In section 3 we showed that initial data consisting of the values of the solution u ( x, y ) and its first normal derivatives on M , through a procedure of extension, give rise to constraint-satisfying Cauchy data on a codimension-one hypersurface N .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 15
In case d1=p1, it is not possible to extend arbitrary data to a function u=E(w) satisfying the constraint supp(û(ξ,η'))⊆R1.
“In case d 1 = p 1 , it is not possible to extend arbitrary data to a function u = E ( w ) which satisfies the constraint supp(ˆ u ( ξ, η ′ )) ⊆ R 1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 14
For such mixed data, it is possible to extend the data, along with attendant Sobolev bounds on the extended functions, in most cases.
“But it is possible, along with attendant Sobolev bounds on the extended functions, in most cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 2
Our work provides a rigorous analytic alternative for Woodhouse's solution method, which is not restricted to this choice of space and time dimensions.
“Our work provides a rigorous analytic alternative for his solution method, which is not restricted to this choice of space and time dimensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 5
Imposing a constraint on the initial data makes the solution process well defined.
“On the other hand, imposing a constraint on the initial data, the solution process is well defined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3. The initial value problem in higher codimension · p. 8
Initial value problems with data posed on a hypersurface of codimension greater than or equal to two are generally ill-posed.
“Therefore one might consider the initial value problem with data posed on a hypersurface of codimension greater than or equal to two. Such problems are generally ill-posed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On determinism and well-posedness in multiple time dimensions · p. 1
The initial value problem on higher codimension hypersurfaces is ill-posed due to failure of uniqueness, at least when specifying a finite number of derivatives of the data.
“In contrast, we show that the initial value problem on higher codimension hypersurfaces is ill-posed due to failure of uniqueness, at least when specifying a finite number of derivatives of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19
The extensions from initial data on M to constraint-satisfying Cauchy data on N are highly nonunique.
“These extensions are highly nonunique, and therefore so are the resulting global solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ On determinism and well-posedness in multiple time dimensions · p. 1
The paper gives a generalization of Courant's theorem which extends to a broader class of equations.
“We give a generalization of Courant's theorem which extends to a broader class of equations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 1. Introduction · p. 3
For initial value problems of type (i) and (ii) on higher codimension hypersurfaces, solutions are highly nonunique, even among H^m smooth solutions and with the constraint from section 2 imposed.
“In section 3 we consider the initial value problem for data given on higher codimension hypersurfaces, and we find that solutions are highly nonunique for the initial value problems of type (i) and (ii) above, even among H m smooth solutions and with the imposition of the constraint given in section 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 9
Using the extension operator, one can generate constraint-satisfying Cauchy data on N from initial data on M.
“Using the extension operator, we generate constraint-satisfying Cauchy data on N from initial data on M as follows:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 6
The solutions in X_S, X_U, and X_C are continuous with respect to their Cauchy data taken in the respective subspaces.
“These solutions are continuous with respect to their Cauchy data taken in the respective subspaces. This is the result of the next theorem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 2
One may specify an arbitrary finite number of normal derivatives of the solution on the higher codimension hypersurface, and insist upon smooth solutions, yet still fail to achieve uniqueness.
“Indeed, one may specify an arbitrary finite number of normal derivatives of the solution on the higher codimension hypersurface, and insist upon smooth solutions, yet still fail to achieve uniqueness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 14
The two conditions required for the kernel to satisfy the constraint E(w)∈X_C for arbitrary data w are always satisfiable, except when ξ''={0}, meaning d1=p1 and the extension subspace {(ξ'',η'')} is purely timelike.
“These two conditions are always satisfiable, except in the case ξ ′′ = { 0 } , meaning that d 1 = p 1 and the extension subspace { ( ξ ′′ , η ′′ ) } is purely timelike.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 17
The constructed Cauchy data satisfies the constraint, that is, (u0,u1)∈X_C, the center manifold.
“By design, this Cauchy data satisfies the constraint, that is, ( u 0 , u 1 ) ∈ X C , the center manifold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 15
If d1 > p1, then there is a choice of kernel χ (indeed many) such that u=E(w) satisfies the constraint and higher Sobolev norms of u=E(w) are bounded as stated.
“Theorem 3.6. If d 1 > p 1 then there is a choice of kernel χ (indeed there are many such choices) such that u = E ( w ) satisfies”
- Also stated in: § ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 15 · plain
“Higher Sobolev norms of u = E ( w ) are bounded as follows”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 15 · plain
- Findingnone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 2
The issue of stability and uniqueness for the Cauchy problem can be addressed by imposing nonlocal constraints that arise naturally from the field equations.
“We find that the issue of stability and uniqueness for the Cauchy problem can be addressed by imposing nonlocal constraints that arise naturally from the field equations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 17
A satisfactory kernel of an extension operator E can be constructed such that all functions u=E(w) in its range have Fourier support satisfying supp(û) ≤ { |η'|^2 < |ξ|^2 }.
“In doing so, we arrive at a satisfactory kernel of an extension operator E with the property that all functions u = E ( w ) in its range have Fourier support satisfying supp(ˆ u ) ≤ { | η ′ | 2 < | ξ | 2 } .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 3
Among smooth solutions, data in an arbitrarily small ellipsoidal neighborhood of a disk in M uniquely determine the data in the envelope of its light cones.
“We do show in section 4 that among smooth solutions, data in an arbitrarily small ellipsoidal neighborhood of a disk in M uniquely determine the data in the envelope of its light cones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 3
The result that the Cauchy problem is ill-posed in general but well-posed under a nonlocal constraint also applies to the wave equation with Cauchy data on a mixed signature hypersurface.
“This applies as well to the wave equation with Cauchy data on a mixed signature hypersurface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 8
In the case of the ordinary wave equation (d1 = 1), solutions in X_C correspond to the full energy space H^1 × L^2.
“In the case of the ordinary wave equation ( d 1 = 1), solutions in X C correspond to the full energy space H 1 × L 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 17
A sufficiently large class of data (w0, w(α'',0), w(0,β''), wβ1) on M extends to Cauchy data on N that is both of finite energy and satisfies the constraint.
“Finally, we show that a sufficiently large class of data ( w 0 , w ( α ′′ , 0) , w (0 ,β ′′ ) , w β 1 ) on M extends to Cauchy data on the hypersurface N which is both of finite energy and satisfies the constraint.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 16
Data in region R2 would lead to an ill-posed initial value problem if M were considered itself as a codimension-one hypersurface.
“where we note that the region ˜ R 2 contains the data which would lead to an ill-posed initial value problem if M were considered itself as a codimension one hypersurface.”
- Also stated in: § ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 16 · hedged
“By itself, this region would give rise to data in L 2 ( M ) for which the Cauchy problem of mixed type is ill-posed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 16 · hedged
- Findingown data§ 1. Introduction · p. 3
The Cauchy problem for the ultrahyperbolic equation (1.2) is ill-posed in general.
“In section 2 we use Fourier methods to show that the Cauchy problem for the ultrahyperbolic equation (1.2) is ill-posed in general but well-posed on Sobolev spaces H m if an explicit nonlocal constraint is imposed upon the Cauchy data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 2
The values of a solution in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of the initial hypersurface are sufficient to determine the solution uniquely.
“In contrast to this, we conclude with a result that essentially recovers and generalizes a theorem of Courant, which shows that the values of a solution in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of the initial hypersurface are sufficient to determine the solution uniquely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ ( b ) The extension problem for general spacelike data · p. 13
The extension operator E is bounded on the function spaces specified in Theorem 3.4, with m the exponent of Sobolev regularity.
“Theorem 3.4. The extension operator E is bounded on the following function spaces:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19
Given k, there exist constraint-satisfying data u0,u1 on N which vanish to order k on M.
“Theorem 4.1. Given k , there exist constraint-satisfying data u 0 , u 1 on N which vanish to order k on M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 16
As long as d1>p1, extensions can be found for data in region R2 such that the well-posedness constraint is satisfied, by making up the default caused by | ̃ξ|<| ̃η| with a choice of large |ξ''|.
“That is, as long as d 1 > p 1 , so that { ξ ′′ } is not restricted to the zero-dimensional vector space, extensions can be found in a way that the default in satisfying the constraint caused by the fact that ∣ ∣ ∣ ˜ ξ ∣ ∣ ∣ < | ˜ η | can be made up with a choice of large | ξ ′′ | .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ( b ) The extension problem for general spacelike data · p. 13
Given w0 ∈ ̇H(M) and wα ∈ ̇H(M), the energy norm of the extension is finite.
“Theorem 3.5. Given w 0 ∈ ˙ H ( M ) and w α ∈ ˙ H ( M ) , the energy norm of the extension”
- Also stated in: § ( b ) The extension problem for general spacelike data · p. 13 · plain
“is finite; indeed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ( b ) The extension problem for general spacelike data · p. 13 · plain
- Findingnone given§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 5
General initial data in H^{m+1} × H^m do not even give rise to solutions which are tempered distributions for any nonzero y1.
“However, it is clear that general initial data in H m +1 × H m do not even give rise to solutions which are tempered distributions for any nonzero y 1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3. The initial value problem in higher codimension · p. 8
Even imposing the constraint discussed in section 2, which is the requirement of global existence, smooth solutions are highly non-unique.
“Moreover, even imposing the constraint discussed in section 2, which is the requirement of global existence, smooth solutions are highly non-unique.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19
Specifying any finite number of derivatives of u on M does not remedy the nonuniqueness.
“In fact, if one specifies any finite number of derivatives of u on M it does not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21
For any w=(w1,w') with |w|≤1 (the unit sphere in R^{d2}), the region between the cone Rε(w) and the ellipsoid Zε is a region of determinacy for the ultrahyperbolic equation.
“We will show that for any w = ( w 1 , w ′ ) with | w | ≤ 1 (namely the unit sphere in R d 2 ), the region between the cone R ε ( w ) and the ellipsoid Z ε is a region of determinacy for the ultrahyperbolic equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19
The resulting global solutions are nonunique.
“These extensions are highly nonunique, and therefore so are the resulting global solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19
Any other solution v(x,y) which takes on specified data on M up to k-many derivatives may be changed by adding this solution u to it, without changing its initial data.
“Hence any other solution v ( x, y ) which takes on specified data on M up to k -many derivatives may be changed by adding this solution u to it, without changing its initial data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 5
Some constraint is necessary, as evident from the Asgeirsson mean value theorem and its consequences, as discussed in Courant (1962).
“The fact that some constraint is necessary is indeed evident from the Asgeirsson mean value theorem, and its consequences, as discussed in Courant (1962).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Courant (1962)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ On determinism and well-posedness in multiple time dimensions · p. 1
A uniqueness result for data given in an arbitrary neighborhood of such initial hypersurfaces follows from Asgeirsson's mean value theorem, as deduced by Courant.
“This failure is in contrast to a uniqueness result for data given in an arbitrary neighborhood of such initial hypersurfaces, which Courant deduces from Asgeirsson's mean value theorem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Courant
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19
Therefore, there exists a globally defined solution u(x,y) which has initial data u(x,y)=u0, ∂y1 u(x,y)=u1 on N, and which vanishes to order k on M.
“Therefore, there exists a globally defined solution u ( x, y ) which has initial data u ( x, y ) = u 0 , ∂ y 1 u ( x, y ) = u 1 on N , which vanishes to order k on M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 14
The existence of the extension for mixed data follows as in Theorems 3.4 and 3.5 from the construction of an extension operator E with certain boundedness properties on appropriate Sobolev spaces.
“The existence of such an extension follows as in Theorems 3.4 and 3.5 from the construction of an extension operator E with certain boundedness properties on appropriate Sobolev spaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21
For a given Rε(w), the Holmgren-John theorem is based upon the construction of an analytic family of noncharacteristic hypersurfaces Sλ with which to sweep the region between Zε and Rε(w).
“For a given R ε ( w ), the Holmgren-John theorem is based upon the construction of an analytic family of noncharacteristic hypersurfaces S λ with which to sweep the region between Z ε and R ε ( w ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites John 1982
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20
Knowledge of the data in a small cylinder determines the values of all derivatives on N={ (x,y): y=0 } (if the data are smooth).
“In turn, knowledge of the data in a small cylinder determines the values of all of its derivatives on N = { ( x, y ) : y = 0 } (if the data are smooth).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20
Specification of a possibly large but finite number of derivatives does not lead to unique solutions, even when the constraint is imposed and the resulting solutions are globally defined and smooth.
“This contrasts to the case discussed in section 4, in which it is shown that specification of a possibly large but finite number of derivatives does not lead to unique solutions, even when the constraint is imposed and the resulting solutions are globally defined and smooth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21
Given the values of a C2 solution u(x,y) to (1.2) in the space-time ellipsoid Wε, one may slice it with a hyperplane containing the x-coordinate axes but otherwise arbitrarily oriented in y to determine a possible Zε, which in turn determines the solution over the larger conical region Rε with base Zε.
“Namely, given the values of a C 2 solution u ( x, y ) to (1.2) in the space-time ellipsoid”
- Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21 · hedged
“we may slice it with a hyperplane which contains the x -coordinate axes but which is otherwise arbitrarily oriented in y , to determine a possible Z ε , which in turn determines the solution over the larger conical region R ε with base Z ε .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21 · hedged
- May combine two claims. 25
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 15If d1=p1 and initially supp(ŵ(ξ,η'))⊆R1 (i.e., w=π2w), then such an extension is possible, and the stated estimates hold for u=E(w).
“However, if initially supp( ˆ w ( ξ, η ′ )) ⊆ ˜ R 1 (i.e., w = π 2 w ), then such an extension is possible, and we have, for u = E ( w ) ,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3. The initial value problem in higher codimension · p. 8The initial value problem fails to be well-posed in several ways: resulting solutions may be singular, or they may be selected to satisfy the constraint and be regular for all y1 ∈ R, however they will not be unique.
“Thus the initial value problem fails to be well-posed in several ways: resulting solutions may be singular, or they may be selected to satisfy the constraint and be regular for all y 1 ∈ R , however they will not be unique.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 9The extension operator E is a bounded operator on the stated space of functions; in addition, when w ∈ H^{-3/2}(M), then y2 E(w) ∈ L^2(N) and a further estimate holds.
“Theorem 3.2. The extension operator E is a bounded operator on the following space of functions:”
- Also stated in: § ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 9 · plain
“In addition, when w ∈ ˙ H -3 / 2 ( M ) then y 2 E ( w ) ∈ L 2 ( N ) and furthermore”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 9 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 18Given data (w0, w(α'',0), w(0,β''), wβ1) on M with |α''|=|β''|=1 satisfying the stated conditions, the extension (u0,u1) given by expression (3.2) has finite energy and lies in the center subspace X_C; if d1=p1, one must additionally ask that π2 wγ=0 for all multi-indices γ in question.
“Theorem 3.7. Given data ( w 0 , w ( α ′′ , 0) , w (0 ,β ′′ ) , w β 1 ) on M with | α ′′ | = | β ′′ | = 1 , suppose that”
- Also stated in: § ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 18 · plain
“Then the extension ( u 0 , u 1 ) given by expression (3.2) has finite energy and lies in the center subspace X C . If d 1 = p 1 , then we have to ask that π 2 w γ = 0 in the above statement, for all multi-indices γ in question.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 18 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 2None of these results rely upon properties of analyticity of the data or the solution.
“We remark that none of these results rely upon properties of analyticity of the data or the solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 8The problem is well-posed in the sense that data in X_S continuously propagates to all y1 ∈ R+, data in X_U continuously propagates to all times y1 ∈ R-, and data in X_C, an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, are defined globally in time.
“Thus the problem is wellposed in the following sense: data in X S continuously propagates to all y 1 ∈ R + , data in X U continuously propagates to all times y 1 ∈ R -, and data in X C , which constitute an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, are defined globally in time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 7The higher energy space X^m decomposes into three subspaces X^{m,S}, X^{m,U}, and X^{m,C} = X^{m,S} ∩ X^{m,U} with estimates for y1 ≥ 0 and y1 ≤ 0, and a global solution exists with higher Sobolev regularity; when m > ((d1 + (d2 - 1))/2) + 2, such solutions are classical C^2 by the Sobolev embedding theorem.
“Corollary 2.4. The higher energy space X m decomposes into three subspaces, X m,S , X m,U and X m,C = X m,S ∩ X m,U such that for u, v ∈ X m,S and y 1 ≥ 0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 2Under the above constraints one can preserve stability in the higher codimension setting, but uniqueness is lost, and thus determinism.
“We show that under the above constraints one can preserve stability in this setting, but uniqueness is lost, and thus determinism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 4The energy associated with equation (2.1) is indefinite and not bounded below, hence it does not in general define an energy norm with which to control the Sobolev norms of solutions of the evolution equations.
“The energy is indefinite and in particular not bounded below, hence it does not in general define an energy norm with which to control the Sobolev norms of solutions of the evolution equations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 10Suppose w0 ∈ H^{1/2}(M), w01 ∈ H^{-1/2}, and w10 ∈ H^{-1/2}. Then the energy norm of the extension u0 = E(w0)(x1,y2) + y2 E(w01)(x1,y2), u1(x1,y2) = E(w10)(x1,y2) is finite; additionally, the higher energy norms defining the X^m topology for (u0,u1) are bounded by this extension process.
“Theorem 3.3. Suppose that w 0 ∈ ˙ H 1 / 2 ( M ) , w 01 ∈ ˙ H -1 / 2 and w 10 ∈ ˙ H -1 / 2 . Then the energy norm of the extension u 0 = E ( w 0 )( x 1 , y 2 ) + y 2 E ( w 01 )( x 1 , y 2 ) , u 1 ( x 1 , y 2 ) = E ( w 10 )( x 1 , y 2 ) is finite:”
- Also stated in: § ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 10 · plain
“Additionally, the higher energy norms with which one defines the X m topology for ( u 0 , u 1 ) are also bounded by this extension process, namely”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 10 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 15In the case d1=p1, R1={0} and K_n = H^{r-r2}(d2-p2-1).
“We note that in the case where d 1 = p 1 , ˜ R 1 = { 0 } and K n = H r -r 2 ( d 2 -p 2 -1) .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ On determinism and well-posedness in multiple time dimensions · p. 1Under a nonlocal constraint, the initial value problem posed on codimension-one hypersurfaces (the Cauchy problem) has global unique solutions in the Sobolev spaces H^m, and is therefore well-posed.
“We show that under a nonlocal constraint, the initial value problem posed on codimension-one hypersurfaces - the Cauchy problem - has global unique solutions in the Sobolev spaces H m . Thus it is well-posed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 6For u ∈ X_C, Φ_C^{y1} = Φ_S^{y1} for y1 ≥ 0 and Φ_C^{y1} = Φ_U^{y1} for y1 ≤ 0, and equality holds in both (2.6) and (2.7).
“For u ∈ X C , Φ C y 1 = Φ S y 1 for y 1 ≥ 0 and Φ C y 1 = Φ U y 1 for y 1 ≤ 0 , and equality holds in both (2.6) and (2.7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ ( a ) Codimension 2 to codimension 1 in R 3 · p. 10The pair of functions (u0(x1,y2), u1(x1,y2)) gives Cauchy data for the codimension one problem discussed in Section 2, and because of the properties of the extension, it satisfies the constraint conditions of X_C for solutions globally defined in y1.
“The pair of functions ( u 0 ( x 1 , y 2 ) , u 1 ( x 1 , y 2 )) gives Cauchy data for the codimension one problem that is discussed in Section 2. Because of the properties of the extension, it satisfies the constraint conditions of X C for solutions which are globally defined in y 1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2. The Cauchy problem · p. 6For (u0,u1) ∈ X_S, the Cauchy problem of mixed signature for equation (2.1) has a unique solution in X for all y1 ∈ R+. For (u0,u1) ∈ X_U the problem has a unique solution for all y1 ∈ R-, and whenever (u0,u1) ∈ X_C the solution exists globally in y1 ∈ R. In each case, the map y1 → u(x,y1,y') is C^1.
“Theorem 2.2. For ( u 0 u 1 ) ∈ X S , the Cauchy problem of mixed signature for equation (2.1) has a unique solution in X for all y 1 ∈ R + . For ( u 0 u 1 ) ∈ X U the problem has a unique solution for all y 1 ∈ R -, and whenever ( u 0 u 1 ) ∈ X C the solution exists globally in y 1 ∈ R . In each of these cases, the map y 1 → u ( x, y 1 , y ′ ) is C 1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 23It is easily verified that [the matrix] is positive definite. Recalling λ≤0, it follows that Sλ(w) are all noncharacteristic, and hence the Holmgren-John theorem applies, completing the argument.
“It is easily verified that this is positive definite. Recalling that λ ≤ 0 in the definition of the analytic families of hyperboloids, it follows that S λ ( w ) are all noncharacteristic, and hence the Holmgren-John theorem applies, thus completing the argument.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21All these regions have been shown to be domains of determinacy; their union contains the set D={(x,y): |x|+|y|<1}; therefore if a solution vanishes in Wε it must also vanish in D.
“All of these regions have been shown to be domains of determinacy. Their union contains the set D = { ( x, y ) : | x | + | y | < 1 } . Therefore if a solution vanishes in W ε it must also vanish in D .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21For the case of vertex v=(0,w) with w=e1, the family of hyperboloids constitutes a noncharacteristic analytic family which sweeps the region between Zε and Rε(e1); thus the Holmgren-John uniqueness theorem applies, and this region is a region of determinacy for the ultrahyperbolic equation (1.2).
“Recalling that λ < 0 (except in the limiting case S λ → R ε ) observe that this family of hyperboloids constitutes a noncharacteristic analytic family which sweeps the region between Z ε and R ε ( e 1 ). Thus the Holmgren-John uniqueness theorem applies, and this region is a region of determinacy for the ultrahyperbolic equation (1.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20Theorem 5.1: Let ε>0 and define ellipsoid Zε⊆M. A C2 solution to (1.2) whose Cauchy data vanishes on Zε must necessarily vanish on the set [formula] and in particular its Cauchy data along with all derivatives must vanish on the subset of the Cauchy hypersurface given by {(x,y')∈M: |x|+|y'|<1}.
“Theorem 5.1. Let ε > 0 and define the ellipsoid Z ε ⊆ M by”
- Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20 · plain
“A C 2 solution to (1.2) whose Cauchy data vanishes on Z ε must necessarily vanish on the set”
- Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20 · plain
“and in particular its Cauchy data along with all derivatives must vanish on the subset of the Cauchy hypersurface given by { ( x, y ′ ) ∈ M : | x | + | y ′ | < 1 } .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 21The closure of the envelope of such ellipsoidal cones includes the region D; in fact it is slightly larger.
“The closure of the envelope of such ellipsoidal cones includes the region D ; in fact it is slightly larger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 15The constraint induces a restriction on the data w( ̃ξ, ̃η) in the vicinity of the lightcone {| ̃ξ|=| ̃η|}⊆M̂.
“It is to be expected that the constraint induces a restriction on the data w ( ˜ ξ, ˜ η ) in the vicinity of the 'lightcone' {∣ ∣ ˜ ξ ∣ ∣ = | ˜ η | } ⊆ ˆ M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20Courant (1962) gives a uniqueness result for the ultrahyperbolic equation with data posed on a hypersurface of mixed signature, stating that among C2 solutions, initial values of u(x,0,y') and ∂y1 u(x,0,y') prescribed in a certain set in the Cauchy hypersurface M determine a priori the values of the data on a larger set, and the solution is determined uniquely in a space-time region.
“Courant (1962) gives a uniqueness result for the ultrahyperbolic equation with data posed on a hypersurface of mixed signature, which in our notation states that, among C 2 solutions, initial values of u ( x, 0 , y ′ ) and ∂ y 1 u ( x, 0 , y ′ ) prescribed in the set in the Cauchy hypersurface M given by”
- Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20 · plain
“will determine a priori the values of the data on the larger set”
- Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20 · plain
“Furthermore the solution is determined uniquely in the space-time region”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Courant (1962)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ( c ) The extension problem for mixed spacelike and timelike data · p. 17The singularities introduced at the boundaries of the lightcone {| ̃η|=| ̃ξ|}⊆M̂ by the kernel χ2 impose more severe constraints on the functions w permitted in the domain of E; this is the origin of the unusual requirements on functions w from which data can reasonably be drawn.
“The singularities introduced at the boundaries of the lightcone { | ˜ η | = ∣ ∣ ∣ ˜ ξ ∣ ∣ ∣ } ⊆ ˆ M by the kernel χ 2 impose more severe constraints on the functions w that are permitted in the domain of the operator E ; this is the origin of the somewhat unusual requirements on functions w (˜ x, ˜ y ) from which we can reasonably draw our data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 3This result is analogous to a result in Courant (1962) that is derived from Asgeirsson's mean value theorem.
“This is analogous to a result in Courant (1962) that is derived from Asgeirsson's mean value theorem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Courant (1962)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 4. Failure of uniqueness in higher codimension · p. 19Courant's classic result (1962) in the case of purely timelike M states that data given in any ε-tubular neighborhood of M within N determine solutions uniquely in the C2 category.
“Given Courant's classic result (1962) in the case of purely timelike M , that data given in any ε -tubular neighborhood of M within N determine solutions uniquely in the C 2 category”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Courant (1962)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 2Woodhouse (1992) studied the case of two space and two time dimensions with initial data on a spacelike hypersurface of codimension 2, using the Penrose twistor transform in the real case, and recovered the uniqueness result of Courant and its implicit constraints on well-posed initial data for the Cauchy problem.
“In related and prior work, Woodhouse (1992) studied the case of two space and two time dimensions with initial data on a spacelike hypersurface (thus of codimension 2), using the Penrose twistor transform in the real case. He also recovered the uniqueness result of Courant and its implicit constraints on well-posed inital data for the Cauchy problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Woodhouse (1992) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 3. The initial value problem in higher codimension · p. 8In the presence of multiple time dimensions, spacelike hypersurfaces are necessarily of higher codimension.
“In the presence of multiple time dimensions, spacelike hypersurfaces are necessarily of higher codimension.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20Our proof of the version of Courant's theorem for ellipsoidal domains is based on the Holmgren-John theorem (John 1982), and therefore remains true under perturbations to the equation.
“Our proof of this result is based on the Holmgren-John theorem (John 1982), and therefore remains true under perturbations to the equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites John 1982
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20Data on an arbitrarily small cylindrical subset of M, plus the stipulation of C2 regularity, determine the data and indeed the solution on much larger sets of M and of space-time, respectively.
“The key implication from our point of view is that data on an arbitrarily small cylindrical subset of M , plus the stipulation of C 2 regularity, determine the data and indeed the solution on much larger sets of M and of space-time, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20Courant's proof of this uniqueness result uses the Asgeirsson mean value theorem in a fundamental way.
“Courant's proof of this fact uses the Asgeirsson mean value theorem in a fundamental way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Courant (1962)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. A variant of a uniqueness theorem of Courant · p. 20The result is a robust generalization of the Courant result, which, being based on Asgeirsson's theorem, is true only for precisely the ultrahyperbolic equation.
“Thus it is a robust generalization of the Courant result, which being based on Asgeirsson's theorem is true only for precisely the ultrahyperbolic equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The wave-equation case is identified by the number of space dimensions
MinorThe paper defines the ordinary wave equation as having one time dimension and d 1 space dimensions. Its later parenthesis instead identifies that case by d 1 = 1, which does not specify that there is only one time dimension.
“In the case of the ordinary wave equation ( d 1 = 1), solutions in X C correspond to the full energy space H 1 × L 2 .”
“the wave equation in d 1 -many space dimensions and one time dimension”
Higher-codimension initial data are said to be given on N
MinorSection 3(c) describes the data as given on N, but its setup says the data are posed on M and are to be extended to N. The displayed evaluation at the complementary coordinates (0, 0) also describes data on M, not arbitrary data on N.
“Initial data for a solution u ( x, y ) is given on N , which is expressed in the form ( u, ∂ α ′′ x ′′ u, ∂ β 1 y 1 u, ∂ β ′′ y ′′ u )(˜ x, ˜ y, 0 , 0) = ( w 0 , w α ′′ , w β 1 , w β ′′ )(˜ x, ˜ y ),”
“Given zero'th and first normal derivatives of a solution u ( x, y ) on M , the object is to extend this data to the codimension one hypersurface N = { y 1 = 0 }”
Theorem 3.6 reverses the stated projection labels
MinorThe paper defines π 1 as projection onto data supported in ̃ R 1 and π 2 onto data supported in ̃ R 2. Theorem 3.6 then equates support in ̃ R 1 with w = π 2 w, reversing those definitions in its condition for an extension.
“supp( ˆ w ( ξ, η ′ )) ⊆ ˜ R 1 (i.e., w = π 2 w )”
“The orthogonal projections onto functions supported in ˜ R 1 , ˜ R 2 respectively, are denoted π 1 and π 2 .”
Cites
Partial Differential Equations
John, F. (1971) · Applied mathematical sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9966-1 · Cited by 1,934 · see citing works
<i>Methods of Mathematical Physics</i>
Courant, R., Hilbert, D., & Teichmann, T. (1962) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3057861 · Cited by 1,419 · see citing works
Methods of mathematical physics, Vol. 2, Partial differential equations
Courant, R., & Hilbert, D. (1989) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527617234 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. II. Partial Differential Equations
Courant, & Hilbert (1963) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.3630089 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Partial Differential Equations.
White, A. M., Bers, L., John, F., & Schecter, M. (1967) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2314619 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
On the dimensionality of spacetime
Tegmark, M. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/4/002 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Bars, I. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/16/303 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Itzhak Bars, A. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Worldvolume theories, holography, duality and time
HULL, C. M., & Khuri, R. R. (2000) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00057-2 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Dorling, J. (1970) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1976386 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Contour integrals for the ultrahyperbolic wave equation
Woodhouse, N. M. J. (1992) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1992.0102 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Germ of a synthesis: space–time is spinorial, extra dimensions are time-like
Sparling, G. A. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1839 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Duality and Strings, Space and TimePreprint
HULL, C. M. (1999) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9911080 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Worldvolume Theories, Holography, Duality and Time
Hull, C. M., & Khuri, R. R. (1999) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9911082
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hull C. M., 1999, Proc. of ‘Mathematical Sciences Beyond the Second Millennium’
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-9333-7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Negative branes, supergroups and the signature of spacetime
Dijkgraaf, R., Heidenreich, B., Jefferson, P., & Vafa, C. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2018)050 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Regular hyperbolicity, dominant energy condition and causality for Lagrangian theories of maps
Wong, W. W.-Y. (2011) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/215008 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The Area of Graphs on Arbitrary Carnot Groups with Sub-Lorentzian Structure
Karmanova, M. B. (2020) · Siberian Mathematical Journal · doi:10.1134/s0037446620040084 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Two-step sub-Lorentzian structures and graph surfaces
Karmanova, M. B. (2019) · Izvestiya Mathematics · doi:10.1070/im8879 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Nonlocality without nonlocalityPreprint
Weinstein, S. (2008) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationDifferential equations with Bessel operator
Shishkina, E. L., & Ситник, С. М. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819781-3.00013-6 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Foundations of a theory of quantum gravityPreprint
Noldus, J. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1101.5113 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Reparametrization Invariance and Some of the Key Properties of Physical Systems
Gueorguiev, V. G., & Maeder, A. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13030522 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
General Euler-Poisson-Darboux Equation and Hyperbolic B-Potentials
Shishkina, E. L. (2019) · Contemporary Mathematics Fundamental Directions · doi:10.22363/2413-3639-2019-65-2-157-338 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Is the Metric Signature Really Electromagnetic in Origin?
Chen, L., & Read, J. A. M. (2023) · Philosophy of Physics · doi:10.31389/pop.45 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Class of Maximal Graph Surfaces on Multidimensional Two-Step Sub-Lorentzian Structures
Karmanova, M. B. (2018) · Doklady Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1064562418030043 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Uniqueness of solution of an inverse source problem for ultrahyperbolic equations
Gölgeleyen, F., & Yamamoto, M. (2019) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ab63a2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
On the origin of the weak equivalence principle in a theory of emergent quantum mechanics
Torromé, R. G. (2020) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887820501571 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Stability of inverse problems for ultrahyperbolic equations
Gölgeleyen, F., & Yamamoto, M. (2014) · Chinese Annals of Mathematics Series B · doi:10.1007/s11401-014-0848-6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
On a Cauchy problem for the wave equation with data on a time-like hyperplane
Blagoveshchensky, A. S., & Podymaka, F. N. (2016) · Days on Diffraction · doi:10.1109/dd.2016.7756816 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Multiple Time DimensionsPreprint
Weinstein, S. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0812.3869 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationBridging the Objective/Subjective Divide
Schooler, J. W. (2015) · doi:10.15502/9783958570405 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Coarea Formula for Vector Functions on Carnot Groups with Sub-Lorentzian Structure
Karmanova, M. B. (2021) · Siberian Mathematical Journal · doi:10.1134/s0037446621020051 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Graphs of Lipschitz Mappings on Two-Step Sub-Lorentzian Structures with Multidimensional Time
Karmanova, M. B. (2018) · Doklady Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1064562418050186 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Multi-Time Wave Functions Versus Multiple Timelike Dimensions
Lienert, M., Petrat, S., & Tumulka, R. (2017) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0120-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zahir, S. (2023) · Journal of Modern Physics · doi:10.4236/jmp.2023.1410077 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lipschitz Images of Open Sets on Sub-Lorentzian Structures
Karmanova, M. B. (2024) · Siberian Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1055134424010036 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Alternative route towards the change of metric signature
Zhang, F. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.064043 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Effingham, N. (2021) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies6040085 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Площадь графиков на произвольных группах Карно с сублоренцевой структурой
Карманова, М. Б. (2020) · Sibirskii matematicheskii zhurnal · doi:10.33048/smzh.2020.61.408 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Determinism, well-posedness, and applications of the ultrahyperbolic wave equation in spacekime
Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Deng, D., & Dinov, I. D. (2022) · Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.padiff.2022.100280 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A study of the multitime evolution equation with time-nonlocal conditions
Benrabah, A., Rebbani, F., & Boussetila, N. (2011) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Conditional stability for a Cauchy problem for the ultrahyperbolic Schrödinger equation
Gölgeleyen, İ., & Kaytmaz, Ö. (2020) · Applicable Analysis · doi:10.1080/00036811.2020.1781829 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Surface area on two-step sub-Lorentzian structures with multi-dimensional time
Karmanova, M. B. (2017) · Doklady Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1064562417030085 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Area of Graph Surfaces on Carnot Groups with Sub-Lorentzian Structure
Karmanova, M. B. (2019) · Doklady Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1064562419020078 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sub-Lorentzian Coarea Formula for Mappings of Carnot Groups
Karmanova, M. B. (2022) · Siberian Mathematical Journal · doi:10.1134/s0037446622030090 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Maximal Surfaces on Two-Step Sub-Lorentzian Structures
Karmanova, M. B. (2020) · Trends in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53305-2_9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pérez-Nadal, G. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5013-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Area of Surfaces on Sub-Lorentzian Structures of Depth Two
Karmanova, M. B. (2023) · Siberian Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1055134423030069 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Quantum entanglement without nonlocal causation in (3,2)-dimensional spacetime
Pettini, M. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013261 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Graphs of non-smooth contact mappings on carnot groups with sub-lorentzian structure
Karmanova, M. B. (2019) · Доклады Академии наук · doi:10.31857/s0869-56524863275-279 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Graphs of Nonsmooth Contact Mappings on Carnot Groups with Sub-Lorentzian Structure
Karmanova, M. B. (2019) · Doklady Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1064562419030104 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
ПЛОЩАДЬ ПОВЕРХНОСТЕЙ НА ДВУСТУПЕНЧАТЫХ СУБЛОРЕНЦЕВЫХ СТРУКТУРАХ С МНОГОМЕРНЫМ ВРЕМЕНЕМ
Karmanova, M. B. (2017) · Доклады Академии наук · doi:10.7868/s086956521714002x · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ontological status of time in chemistry
Sukumar, N. (2020) · Foundations of Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s10698-020-09370-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Classes of Maximal Surfaces on Carnot Groups
Karmanova, M. B. (2020) · Siberian Mathematical Journal · doi:10.1134/s0037446620050043 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Классы максимальных поверхностей на группах Карно
Карманова, М. Б. (2020) · Sibirskii matematicheskii zhurnal · doi:10.33048/smzh.2020.61.504 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Двуступенчатые сублоренцевы структуры и поверхности-графики
Karmanova, M. B. (2020) · Известия Российской академии наук Серия математическая · doi:10.4213/im8879 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Schwarzschild Black Holes in Extended Spacetime with Two Time Dimensions
Paiman, M., Cornean, H. D., & Köhn, C. (2023) · Astronomy · doi:10.3390/astronomy2040018 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
On blowing-up solutions for multi-time nonlinear hyperbolic equations and systems
Ahmad, B., Alsaedi, A., Cuesta, E., & Kirane, M. (2017) · Filomat · doi:10.2298/fil1709599a · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mathematics: Intuition’s Consistency Check
Wharton, K. B. (2016) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27495-9_9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Concurrent systems and time synchronization
Burgin, M., & Grathoff, A. (2018) · International Journal of General Systems · doi:10.1080/03081079.2018.1425298 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Magnetic monopoles in two time dimensions
Elsborg, J., & Köhn, C. (2022) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x2250141x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
How Fast Time PassesPreprint
Savitt, S. F. (2011) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sousa, R., Guerra, M., & YAKUBOVICH, S. B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.02338 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
(2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819781-3.00019-7
Convolution-Like Structures on Multidimensional Spaces
Sousa, R., Guerra, M., & YAKUBOVICH, S. B. (2022) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05296-5_5
Fuzzy Time Instants and Time Model
Raczyński, S. (2022) · Simulation foundations, methods and applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11926-2_11
The problem of determining multiple coefficients in an ultrahyperbolic equation
Gölgeleyen, F. (2023) · Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems · doi:10.1515/jiip-2022-0091
Quantum Entanglement without nonlocal causation in (3,2)-dimensional spacetimePreprint
Pettini, M. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.17070
An electroweak theory of leptons in six dimensions
Betancourt, C. (2025) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116947
Demchenko, M. N. (2025) · Days on Diffraction · doi:10.1109/dd66835.2025.11263492
Banerjee, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2026) · EPJ Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202637001015
Velev, M. V., & Dinov, I. D. (2026) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae7778
A proposed E 8 × E 8 kinematic scaffolding for the standard model with pre-gravitation
KAUSHIK, P., Vaibhav, V., & Singh, T. P. (2026) · Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A · doi:10.1515/zna-2026-0190
Zahir, S. (2026) · Journal of Modern Physics · doi:10.4236/jmp.2026.179050
Temporal-plane Carroll-Schrödinger dynamics and vortex sectors in (2, 2) Klein space
Anonymous, & Polanco, M. A. (2026) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/qytv-2kcz
- Authors
- Craig, W., & Weinstein, S.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Craig, Walter
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2009-07-15
- Volume
- 465
- Issue
- 2110
- Pages
- 3023-3046
- ISSN
- 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2946
- OpenAlex
- W2131560474
- Semantic Scholar
- 8b3aa8cec976bfe9ccd7c84816681cae24e68734
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Differential Equations and Boundary Problems
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations
- Keywords
- well-posedness, ill-posed problems, wave equation, ultrahyperbolic equation, initial value problems, Cauchy problem, non-local constraints, uniqueness of solutions, Sobolev spaces, determinism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-31.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-31.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review