The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The hypothalamic control of food intake in rats
Abstract
The effect on feeding behaviour in the rat, of perm anent electrolytic lesions in the hypothalam us which cause obesity, has been studied. Soon after operation, the animals were extremely voracious. As the obesity became established, the voracity was reduced in degree and finally disappeared. Young unoperated rats could not be made to exhibit such voracity even after starvation. The young unoperated animals showed little discrimination against unattractive diets. When fed on meal mixed with an equal weight of kaolin, they obtained a normal nutrient intake, and maintained their weight by doubling the bulk eaten. In the voracious stage, operated animals adapted in this way more quickly than normal; in the obese stage they adapted more slowly and only after loss of considerable body fat. Older unoperated animals, which were moderately obese, resembled the operated ones in their feeding reactions. It is suggested that the effect of hypothalamic damage is to emphasize two components of the urge to eat, a primitive voracious one, and a more discriminative component, either of which may be dominant according to the state of the fat stores. The simplicity of the young rats’ reactions appears to be due to closer co-ordination of these components by the hypothalam us. Modification of the hypothalamic control of energy intake may be a pre-requisite of obesity in general. Reasons are advanced for regarding the hypothalamic mechanism as being sensitive to chemical changes in the blood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Urges to eat and drink in rats.
Adolph, E. F. (1947) · American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content · doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1947.151.1.110 · Cited by 449
Cited by
Roberts, E. W., Deonarine, A., Jones, J. O., Denton, A. E., Feig, C., Lyons, S. K., Espeli, M., Kraman, M., McKenna, B., Wells, R. J. B., et al. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20122344 · Cited by 414
The energy expenditure and food intake of individual men.
Edholm, O. G., Fletcher, J. G., Widdowson, E. M., & McCance, R. A. (1955) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19550040 · Cited by 377
The eating paradox: How we tolerate food.
Woods, S. C. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.98.4.488 · Cited by 337
The physiological psychology of hunger: a physiological perspective
Friedman, M. I., & Stricker, E. M. (1976) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.83.6.409 · Cited by 334
Clarifying the roles of homeostasis and allostasis in physiological regulation.
Ramsay, D. S., & Woods, S. C. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0035942 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1950-11-28
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 889
- Pages
- 535-549
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2030656110
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The hypothalamic control of food intake in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1950.0065
- The paper
- Kennedy, G. (1950). The hypothalamic control of food intake in rats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1950.0065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.