The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A theory of limits in artificial selection
Abstract
(1) The paper presents a theory of selection limits in artificial selection. It is, however, developed primarily in terms of single genes. (2) For a single gene with selective advantage s, the chance of fixation (the expected gene frequency at the limit) is a function only of Ns, where N is the effective population size. In artificial selection based on individual measurements, where the selection differential is ī standard deviations, the expected Limit of individual selection in any population is a function only of Nī. (3) For low values of Nī, the total advance by selection is, for additive genes, 2N times the gain in the first generation but may be much greater than this for recessives, particularly if their initial frequency is low. (4) The half-life of any selection process will, for additive genes, not be greater than 1.4 N generations but may for rare recessives equal 2N. (5) The effect of an initial period of selection or inbreeding or of both together on the limits in further selection is discussed. It appears that the effects of restrictions in population size on the selection limit may be a useful diagnostic tool in the laboratory. (6) The treatment can be extended to deal with the limits of further selection after the crossing of replicate lines from the same population when the initial response has ceased. (7) In a selection programme of individual selection of equal intensity in both sexes, the furthest limit should be attained when half the population is selected from each generation. (8) The treatment can also be extended to include selection based on progeny or family records. Consideration of the optimum structure, as far as the limit is concerned, shows that the use of the information on relatives is always a sacrifice on the eventual limit for the sake of immediate gain in the early generations. The loss may, however, be small in large populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Problems of Stochastic Processes in Genetics
Kimura, M. (1957) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706791 · Cited by 445
THE EFFECT OF INBREEDING ON THE VARIATION DUE TO RECESSIVE GENES
Robertson, A. (1952) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/37.2.189 · Cited by 230
Self-citation
Cited by
The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection
Hill, W. G., & Robertson, A. (1966) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300010156 · Cited by 1,823
Self-citationA Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in Plants
Leimu, R., & Fischer, M. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004010 · Cited by 1,155
The Genetic Architecture of Quantitative Traits
Mackay, T. F. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090633 · Cited by 1,106
Mutation Accumulation and the Extinction of Small Populations
Lynch, M., Conery, J., & Burger, R. (1995) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285812 · Cited by 1,049
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1960-11-29
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 951
- Pages
- 234-249
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2152022752
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theory of limits in artificial selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1960.0099
- The paper
- Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1960.0099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.