The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection
Open accessAbstract
(i) A computer simulation study has been made of selection on two linked loci in small populations, where both loci were assumed to have additive effects on the character under selection with no interaction between loci. If N is the effective population size, i the intensity of selection in standard units, α and β measure the effects of the two loci on the character under selection as a proportion of the pheno-typic standard deviation and c is the crossover distance between them, it was shown that the selection process can be completely specified by Ni α, Ni βand Nc and the initial gene frequencies and linkage disequilibrium coefficient. It is then easily possible to generalize from computer runs at only one population size. All computer runs assumed an initial population at linkage equilibrium between the two loci. Analysis of the results was greatly simplified by considering the influence of segregation at the second locus on the chance of fixation at the first (defined as the proportion of replicate lines in which the favoured allele was eventually fixed). (ii) The effects of linkage are sufficiently described by Nc. The relationship between chance of fixation at the limit and linkage distance (expressed as 2Nc /( 2Nc + 1)) was linear in the majority of computer runs. (iii) When gene frequency changes under independent segregation were small, linkage had no effect on the advance under selection. In general, segregation at the second locus had no detectable influence on the chance of fixation at the first if the gene effects at the second were less than one-half those at the first. With larger gene effects at the second locus, the chance of fixation passed through a minimum and then rose again. For two loci to have a mutual influence on one another, their effects on the character under selection should not differ by a factor of more than two. (iv) Under conditions of suitable relative gene effects, the influence of segregation at the second locus was very dependent on the initial frequency of the desirable allele. The chance of fixation at the first, plotted against initial frequency of the desirable allele at the second, passed through a minimum when the chance of fixation at the second locus was about 0·8. (v) A transformation was found which made the influence of segregation at the second locus on the chance of fixation at the first almost independent of initial gene frequency at the first and of gene effects at the first locus when these are small. (vi) In the population of gametes at final fixation, linkage was not at equilibrium and there was an excess of repulsion gametes. (vii) The results were extended to a consideration of the effect of linkage on the limits under artificial selection. Linkage proved only to be of importance when the two loci had roughly equal effects on the character under selection. The maximum effect on the advance under selection occurred when the chance of fixation at both of the loci was between 0·7 and 0·8. When the advance under selection is most sensitive to changes in recombination value, a doubling of the latter in no case increased the advance under selection by more than about 6%. The proportion selected to give maximum advance under individual selection (0·5 under independent segregation) was increased, but only very slightly, when linkage is important. (viii) These phenomena could be satisfactorily accounted for in terms of the time scale of the selection process and the effective size of the population within which changes of gene frequency at the locus with smaller effect must take place.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selection affecting closely linked loci becomes slightly weakened because drift creates small amounts of LD that on average reduce the response to selection.
“Selection affecting closely linked loci becomes slightly weakened because drift creates small amounts of LD that, on average, reduces the response to selection57.”
From Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. (2008) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
THE EFFECT OF LINKAGE ON DIRECTIONAL SELECTION
Felsenstein, J. (1965) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/52.2.349 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03154 · Cited by 2,750 · see citing works
Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations
Hill, W. G., & Robertson, A. (1968) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01245622 · Cited by 2,035 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE EVOLUTIONARY ADVANTAGE OF RECOMBINATION
Felsenstein, J. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/78.2.737 · Cited by 1,711 · see citing works
Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.
Slatkin, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2361 · Cited by 1,614 · see citing works
Gazal, S., Finucane, H. K., Furlotte, N. A., Loh, P.-R., Palamara, P. F., Liu, X., Schoech, A., Bulik-Sullivan, B., Neale, B. M., Gusev, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3954 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
The Genetic Cost of Neanderthal Introgression
Harris, K., & Nielsen, R. (2016) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.116.186890 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Genome-Wide Inference of Ancestral Recombination Graphs
Rasmussen, M. D., Hubisz, M. J., Gronau, I., & Siepel, A. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004342 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
An evolutionary view of human recombination
Coop, G., & Przeworski, M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1947 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
McVean, G. A. T., & Charlesworth, B. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.929 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Willi, Y., Kristensen, T. N., Sgrò, C. M., Weeks, A. R., Ørsted, M., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2105076119 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Technow, F., Schrag, T. A., Schipprack, W., Bauer, E., Simianer, H., & Melchinger, A. E. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.165860 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Genetic Costs of Domestication and Improvement
Moyers, B. T., Morrell, P. L., & McKay, J. K. (2018) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esx069 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Recombination rate evolution and the origin of species
Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Engelstädter, J., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.016 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
RNA Recombination Enhances Adaptability and Is Required for Virus Spread and Virulence
Xiao, Y., Rouzine, I. M., Bianco, S., Acevedo, A., Goldstein, E. F., Farkov, M., Brodsky, L., & Andino, R. (2016) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.009 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
The legacy of domestication: accumulation of deleterious mutations in the dog genome
Cruz, F., Vila, C., & Webster, M. T. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn177 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Orthology, Paralogy, and Conserved Synteny for Dog and Human
Goodstadt, L., & Ponting, C. P. (2006) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020133 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Experimental evolution as a high-throughput screen for genetic adaptations
Cooper, V. S. (2018) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00121-18 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Takeuchi, N., Kaneko, K., & Koonin, E. V. (2014) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.113.009845 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Island songbirds as windows into evolution in small populations
Leroy, T., Rousselle, M., Tilak, M.-K., Caizergues, A. E., Scornavacca, C., Recuerda, M., Fuchs, J., Illera, J. C., De Swardt, D. H., Blanco, G., et al. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.040 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
A Population Genetics-Phylogenetics Approach to Inferring Natural Selection in Coding Sequences
Wilson, D. J., Hernandez, R. D., Andolfatto, P., & Przeworski, M. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002395 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Goodstadt, L., Heger, A., Webber, C., & Ponting, C. P. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6093907 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Godfroid, M., Dagan, T., & Kupczok, A. (2018) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evy143 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Massey, S. (2015) · Life · doi:10.3390/life5021301 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Conserved meiotic genes point to sex in the Choanoflagellates
CARR, M., LEADBEATER, B. S. C., & BALDAUF, S. L. (2010) · Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00450.x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Li, Y., Wang, G.-D., Wang, M.-S., Irwin, D. M., Wu, D.-D., & Zhang, Y.-P. (2014) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evu245 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Quasispecies-like behavior observed in catalytic RNA populations evolving in a test tube
Diaz Arenas, C., & Lehman, N. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-80 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hill, W. G., & Robertson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- ORCID
- Hill, W. G.
- Venue
- Genetical Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1966-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-294
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W4232591682
- Cited by
- 1,823
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genetics Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- linkage disequilibrium, selective breeding, two-locus model, fixation probability, crossover distance, small populations, additive genetic effects, selection intensity, effective population size, linkage equilibrium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review