Cited by 1,823Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic diversity and population structure

The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection

Open access
Hill, W. G., Robertson, Alan·1966·Genetical Research

Abstract

(i) A computer simulation study has been made of selection on two linked loci in small populations, where both loci were assumed to have additive effects on the character under selection with no interaction between loci. If N is the effective population size, i the intensity of selection in standard units, α and β measure the effects of the two loci on the character under selection as a proportion of the pheno-typic standard deviation and c is the crossover distance between them, it was shown that the selection process can be completely specified by Ni α, Ni βand Nc and the initial gene frequencies and linkage disequilibrium coefficient. It is then easily possible to generalize from computer runs at only one population size. All computer runs assumed an initial population at linkage equilibrium between the two loci. Analysis of the results was greatly simplified by considering the influence of segregation at the second locus on the chance of fixation at the first (defined as the proportion of replicate lines in which the favoured allele was eventually fixed). (ii) The effects of linkage are sufficiently described by Nc. The relationship between chance of fixation at the limit and linkage distance (expressed as 2Nc /( 2Nc + 1)) was linear in the majority of computer runs. (iii) When gene frequency changes under independent segregation were small, linkage had no effect on the advance under selection. In general, segregation at the second locus had no detectable influence on the chance of fixation at the first if the gene effects at the second were less than one-half those at the first. With larger gene effects at the second locus, the chance of fixation passed through a minimum and then rose again. For two loci to have a mutual influence on one another, their effects on the character under selection should not differ by a factor of more than two. (iv) Under conditions of suitable relative gene effects, the influence of segregation at the second locus was very dependent on the initial frequency of the desirable allele. The chance of fixation at the first, plotted against initial frequency of the desirable allele at the second, passed through a minimum when the chance of fixation at the second locus was about 0·8. (v) A transformation was found which made the influence of segregation at the second locus on the chance of fixation at the first almost independent of initial gene frequency at the first and of gene effects at the first locus when these are small. (vi) In the population of gametes at final fixation, linkage was not at equilibrium and there was an excess of repulsion gametes. (vii) The results were extended to a consideration of the effect of linkage on the limits under artificial selection. Linkage proved only to be of importance when the two loci had roughly equal effects on the character under selection. The maximum effect on the advance under selection occurred when the chance of fixation at both of the loci was between 0·7 and 0·8. When the advance under selection is most sensitive to changes in recombination value, a doubling of the latter in no case increased the advance under selection by more than about 6%. The proportion selected to give maximum advance under individual selection (0·5 under independent segregation) was increased, but only very slightly, when linkage is important. (viii) These phenomena could be satisfactorily accounted for in terms of the time scale of the selection process and the effective size of the population within which changes of gene frequency at the locus with smaller effect must take place.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0016672300010156

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selection affecting closely linked loci becomes slightly weakened because drift creates small amounts of LD that on average reduce the response to selection.

    “Selection affecting closely linked loci becomes slightly weakened because drift creates small amounts of LD that, on average, reduces the response to selection57.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, W. G., & Robertson, A.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
Genetical Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1966-12
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
269-294
ISSN
  • 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5073
OpenAlex
W4232591682
Cited by
1,823
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 62
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Genetics Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
linkage disequilibrium, selective breeding, two-locus model, fixation probability, crossover distance, small populations, additive genetic effects, selection intensity, effective population size, linkage equilibrium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review