The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review Lectures on Senescence - I. The causes of ageing
Abstract
Ageing processes are defined as those which increase the susceptibility of individuals as they grow older to the factors which may cause death. Various possible theories of ageing are considered, and evidence which may help to decide between them discussed. Changes in different organ systems may be merely symptoms of some single ageing process, or they may be largely independent, and synchronized by natural selection. Even if different organ systems age independently, they may do so as a result of similar changes at a cellular level. Cellular theories of ageing may have to take into account the effects of selection between the cells in a tissue. The effects of radiation, and somatic mutation theories of ageing, are discussed. It is suggested that radiation shortens life by inducing somatic mutations, but that normal ageing is not to any important extent caused by somatic mutations, although it may result from changes in cells which have effects on the physiology of the individual similar to those of somatic mutations. Evidence is presented that in Drosophila and in mice there are two phases in the life span. In Drosophila there is an initial ‘ageing’ phase which is irreversible and occurs at a rate approximately independent of temperature, and a second 'dying' phase, temperature-dependent in rate and reversible at lower temperatures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Traditionally, they have been proposed to contribute to ageing through deleterious effects on cellular fitness11,49, but recent findings question this assumption (Supplementary Note 1).”
From Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Clark A. M. & R ubin M. A. 1961 The m odification b y X -irradiation o f th e life span of haploids and diploids o f th e wasp · DOI
- Clarke J. M. & Maynard Sm ith J. Habrobracon.Radiation Res. 15 244-253. · DOI
- Clarke J. M., 1961, Two phases o f ageing in Drosophila subobscurtM J, Exp. Biol., 38, 679, 10.1242/jeb.38.3.679 · DOI
Cited by
The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains
Hayflick, L. (1965) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9 · Cited by 5,876
Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age
Martincorena, I., Fowler, J. C., Wabik, A., Lawson, A. R. J., Abascal, F., Hall, M. W. J., Cagan, A., Murai, K., Mahbubani, K., Stratton, M. R., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau3879 · Cited by 1,113
Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals
Cagan, A., Baez-Ortega, A., Brzozowska, N., Abascal, F., Coorens, T. H. H., Sanders, M. A., Lawson, A. R. J., Harvey, L. M. R., Bhosle, S., Jones, D., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04618-z · Cited by 481
Genetics of Aging in the Fruit Fly,Drosophila melanogaster
Helfand, S. L., & Rogina, B. (2003) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.040103.095211 · Cited by 152
Hayflick, L. (2004) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/59.6.b547 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Zoology, University College London
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1962-12-18
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 966
- Pages
- 115-127
- ISSN
- 0080-4649
- 2053-9193
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review