The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The measurement of synaptic delay, and the time course of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction
Abstract
Focal recording from active spots of a neuromuscular junction was used to measure the ‘synaptic delay’ between terminal axon spike and end-plate current (e.p.c.). Synaptic delay is defined as the time interval between peak of inward current through the presynaptic membrane and commencement of inward current through the postsynaptic membrane. By substituting magnesium for calcium in the medium, and by adjustable electrophoretic application of calcium from the recording electrode, the e.p.c. can be restricted to the small portion of a single junction which is in contact with the microelectrode, and the statistical average amplitude of the e.p.c. can be reduced to less than quantal unit size. Under these conditions, the latency of the unit components of the e.p.c. can be determined and its statistical fluctuations studied. The synaptic delay at a single end-plate spot has a minimum value, at 20 °C, of 0.4 to 0.5 ms and a modal value of about 0.75 ms. There is considerable fluctuation of the measured intervals during a series of nerve impulses; over 50 % occur within a range of 0.5 ms, the rest being spread out in declining fashion over a further 1 to 4 ms. These latency fluctuations are shown to be a statistical consequence of the quantal process of transmitter release. The contribution of various factors to the minimum synaptic delay are discussed. Terminal conduction time has been effectively eliminated by the method of focal recording. Diffusion of acetylcholine towards the receptors, and its reaction with them must cause delays whose exact values are uncertain, but whose extreme upper limits can be shown to make up only a small part of the observed minimum delay. It is concluded that the synaptic interval arises chiefly from a delay in the release of transmitter after the arrival of the nerve impulse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A quantitative description of end‐plate currents
Magleby, K. L., & Stevens, C. F. (1972) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840 · Cited by 616
Nanodomain coupling between Ca2+ channels and sensors of exocytosis at fast mammalian synapses
Eggermann, E., Bucurenciu, I., Goswami, S. P., & Jonas, P. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3125 · Cited by 500
Molecular Mechanisms for Synchronous, Asynchronous, and Spontaneous Neurotransmitter Release
Kaeser, P. S., & Regehr, W. G. (2014) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170338 · Cited by 447
Pongs, O., Lindemeier, J., Zhu, X. R., Theil, T., Engelkamp, D., Krah-Jentgens, I., Lambrecht, H., Koch, K. W., Schwemer, J., Rivosecchi, R., et al. (1993) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(93)90267-u · Cited by 357
Nicotine addiction: the possible role of functional upregulation
Buisson, B., & Bertrand, D. (2002) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01979-9 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, B., & Miledi, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1965-02-16
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 985
- Pages
- 483-495
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2137614665
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The measurement of synaptic delay, and the time course of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1965.0016
- The paper
- Katz, B., & Miledi, R. (1965). The measurement of synaptic delay, and the time course of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1965.0016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.