Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 616

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A quantitative description of end‐plate currents

Open access
Magleby, K. L., Stevens, C. F.·1972·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. End‐plate currents have been studied in glycerol‐treated frog sartorius nerve—muscle preparations with the voltage clamp technique. 2. The effects of temperature on the decay rate of end‐plate currents were investigated over a temperature range from 10 to 30·5° C. The Q10 for the decay constant of end‐plate currents depends somewhat on membrane potential; at — 100 mV the decay constant has a Q10 of 2·7. 3. Peak end‐plate current depends non‐linearly on membrane potential with a decreasing slope conductance associated with hyperpolarization. 4. The ‘instantaneous’ voltage—current relationship for end‐plate channels was determined by causing step changes in membrane potential during end‐plate current flow. This relationship appears to be linear. 5. The interaction of acetylcholine with its receptor is viewed as being analogous to the first step in enzymic catalysis. On this view, acetylcholine binds to its receptor and induces a conformational change which is responsible for opening end‐plate channels. By analogy to the first steps in the catalytic sequence of enzymes, the binding step is very rapid, almost diffusion‐limited, and the conformational change is rate‐limiting. 6. Equations describing this process have been derived. Expressions for the rate constants have also been derived by considering changing dipole moments of the transmitter‐receptor complex associated with the conformational change. As the transmitter‐receptor complex is in the membrane field, different conformational states have different energies, and the rate of conformational change thus depends on membrane potential. The equations thus derived are shown to account adequately for the time course of end‐plate conductance change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 616

Metadata

Authors
Magleby, K. L., & Stevens, C. F.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-05
Volume
223
Issue
1
Pages
173-197
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2055379426
Cited by
616
References
14
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative description of end‐plate currents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840
The paper
Magleby, K. L., & Stevens, C. F. (1972). A quantitative description of end‐plate currents. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.