The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man
Abstract
This paper lists twelve conditions that must be fulfilled by a satisfactory theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man : such a theory must explain (1) size invariance, (2) position invariance, (3) brightness invariance, (4) the equivalence of outline and filled-in shapes, (5) lack of invariance under most rotations, (6) the known confusions made between patterns, (7) animals’ ability to disregard jitter, (8) the human ability to segment shapes in different ways, (9) the way in which man recognizes complex scenes without recognizing individual details of the scene, (10) perceptual learning, (11) the way in which the brain takes advantage of the redundancy of the visual environment; (12) finally any theory must be consistent with the physiological evidence. The outlines of a theory meeting these conditions are put forward. The model has three parts : (1) A processor that extracts local features from the input picture preserving information about the spatial relationships between the features. (2) A mechanism that induces an abstract description of the output from the processor. (3) A store in which such descriptions are held. Some suggestions are made about the language in which descriptions are framed : it must contain hierarchical elements to allow for the possibility of segmenting a picture in different ways. It is shown how the properties of such a language could account for the facts listed above. In recognizing a picture the output from the store is matched to a stored descriptive rule. What we see is the descriptive rule selected to describe an input picture—we cannot respond to details of the picture not represented in the rule. Since, however, many different rules describe the same input picture, animals and man respond to different aspects of the same picture on different occasions of presentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Cited by
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Gray, J. A. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00013066 · Cited by 4,477
Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862 · Cited by 2,030
Spatial mapping in the primate sensory projection: Analytic structure and relevance to perception
Schwartz, E. L. (1977) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf01885636 · Cited by 629
Computational Neuroscience of Vision
Rolls, E., & Deco, G. (2001) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524885.001.0001 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutherland, N. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1968-12-31
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 1024
- Pages
- 297-317
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2138745022
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1968.0072
- The paper
- Sutherland, N. S. (1968). Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1968.0072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.