The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preventing insect adaptation to insect-resistant crops: are seed mixtures or refugia the best strategy?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainability of Transgenic Insecticidal Cultivars: Integrating Pest Genetics and Ecology
Gould, F. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701 · Cited by 1,392
Humans as the World's Greatest Evolutionary Force
Palumbi, S. R. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.293.5536.1786 · Cited by 1,290
Storer, N. P., Babcock, J. M., Schlenz, M., Meade, T., Thompson, G. D., Bing, J. W., & Huckaba, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec10040 · Cited by 641
Insect resistance management in GM crops: past present and future
Bates, S. L., Zhao, J.-Z., Roush, R. T., & Shelton, A. M. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1056 · Cited by 577
Development of Insect Resistance to Plant Biopesticides: An Overview
Tangtrakulwanich, K., & Reddy, G. V. P. (2014) · Advances in Plant Biopesticides · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2006-0_4 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1992-11-23
- Volume
- 250
- Issue
- 1328
- Pages
- 165-169
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W1984489298
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventing insect adaptation to insect-resistant crops: are seed mixtures or refugia the best strategy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1992.0145
- The paper
- Preventing insect adaptation to insect-resistant crops: are seed mixtures or refugia the best strategy? (1992). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
