The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia : reproductive parasites of arthropods
Abstract
Wolbachia are cytoplasmically inherited bacteria found in reproductive tissues of many arthropod species. These bacteria are associated with reproductive alterations in their hosts, including parthenogenesis, reproductive incompatibility and feminization. A fine-scale phylogenetic analysis was done using DNA sequences from ftsZ, a rapidly evolving bacterial cell-cycle gene. ftsZ sequences were determined for 38 different Wolbachia strains from 31 different species of insects and one isopod. The following results were found: (i) there are two major division of Wolbachia (A and B) which diverged 58-67 millions years before present based upon synonymous substitution rates; (ii) a general concordance is found between the ftsZ and 16S rDNA phylogenies, indicating that these represent bacterial strain (rather than simply gene) phylogenies; however, a possible example of recombination between A and B division bacteria may have occurred in the feminizing Wolbachia present in an isopod; (iii) extensive horizontal transmission of Wolbachia has occurred between insect taxa, including different insect orders; one strain in particular (designated Adm) shows extensive recent horizontal transmission; (iv) there is an association between the Wolbachia found in a parasitic wasp (Nasonia) and its fly host (Protocalliphora), suggesting exchange of bacteria between these species; (v) parthenogenesis induction has evolved several times among the Wolbachia; and (vi) some insects harbour infections with more than one Wolbachia strain, even within individual insects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Hurst, G. D. D., & Jiggins, F. M. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3056 · Cited by 855
T HE E VOLUTION OF A LTERNATIVE G ENETIC S YSTEMS IN I NSECTS
Normark, B. B. (2003) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112703 · Cited by 382
Bandi, C., McCall, J. W., Genchi, C., Corona, S., Venco, L., & Sacchi, L. (1999) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(98)00200-8 · Cited by 250
Ricci, I., Cancrini, G., Gabrielli, S., D'amelio, S., & Favia, G. (2002) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1603/0022-2585-39.4.562 · Cited by 126
wsp Gene Sequences from the Wolbachia of Filarial Nematodes
Bazzocchi, C., Jamnongluk, W., O'Neill, S. L., Anderson, T. J. C., Genchi, C., & Bandi, C. (2000) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s002840010100 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1995-07-22
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 1360
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2102902375
- Cited by
- 902
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia : reproductive parasites of arthropods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1995.0117
- The paper
- Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia : reproductive parasites of arthropods. (1995). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.