Cited by 126Insect symbiosis and bacterial influencesVector-borne infectious diseasesPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Searching for Wolbachia(Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): Large Polymerase Chain Reaction Survey and New Identifications

Ricci, Irene, Cancrini, Gabriella, Gabrielli, Simona, D'amelio, Stefano, Favia, Guido·2002·Journal of Medical Entomology

Abstract

Bacteria of the genus Wolbachia constitute a group of intracellular and maternally inherited micro-organisms that are widespread in arthropods, inducing several reproductive disorders such as cytoplasmic incompatibility in their hosts. Considering relevant biological implications related to the presence of Wolbachia in several insect orders, for example its potential role as mechanism for rapid speciation and as vehicle to drive genetic markers in wild populations of vectors of medical and veterinary interest, we carried out an extensive polymerase chain reaction survey to detect Wolbachia in several species of mosquito belonging to genera involved in the transmission of pathogens. Five species out of 26 tested have shown to be infected; for four of them this is the first evidence of the Wolbachia infection. A phylogenetic analysis was also performed, positioning the five Wolbachia strains in the phyletic subdivision B.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1603/0022-2585-39.4.562

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ricci, I., Cancrini, G., Gabrielli, S., D'amelio, S., & Favia, G.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Journal of Medical Entomology
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
562-567
ISSN
  • 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2928
OpenAlex
W2178187214
Cited by
126
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Keywords
Wolbachia, mosquitoes, cytoplasmic incompatibility, maternally inherited bacteria, Wolbachia phylogeny, new host record
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Anopheles, Base Sequence, Culex, DNA, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Culicidae, Phylogeny, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Wolbachia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review