The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An optimization model for mastication and swallowing in mammals
Open accessAbstract
Mammalian mastication is a process combining simultaneous food comminution and lubrication. The initiation of swallowing, which is voluntary, has been thought to depend on separate thresholds for food particle size and for particle lubrication. Instead of this duality, we suggest that swallowing is initiated when it is sensed that a batch of food particles is binding together under viscous forces so as to form a bolus. Bolus formation ensures that when the food mass is swallowed, it will pass the pharyngeal region safely without risk of inhaling small particles into the lower respiratory tract. Crucial for bolus formation is food particle size reduction by mastication. This allows the tongue to pack particles together tightly by pressure against the hard palate. A major function of salivation is to fill the gradually reducing spaces between particles, so increasing viscous cohesion and promoting bolus formation. If swallowing is delayed, excessive saliva floods the bolus, separating particles and reducing cohesion. Swallowing then becomes more precarious. Our model suggests that there is an optimum moment for a mammal to swallow, defined in terms of a peak cohesive force between food particles. The model is tested on human mastication with two foods, brazil nut and raw carrot, which have very different particle size breakdown rates. The peak cohesive force is much greater with brazil nuts but both foods are predicted to be swallowed after similar numbers of chews despite the very different food particle size reductions achieved at that stage. The predicted number of chews to swallow is in broad agreement with published data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Friction and Lubrication of Solids
Bowden, F. P., Tabor, D., & Palmer, F. (1951) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933017 · Cited by 5,890
Foundations of Colloid Science
Hunter, R. J. (1987) · Cited by 3,747
Theory of Filler Reinforcement
Guth, E. (1945) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1707495 · Cited by 1,232
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATTER
(1962) · Langmuir, the Man and the Scientist · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4831-9911-5.50040-x · Cited by 611
THE PERCEPTION OF FOOD TEXTURE ‐ THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE BREAKDOWN PATH
HUTCHINGS, J. B., & LILLFORD, P. J. (1988) · Journal of Texture Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.1988.tb00928.x · Cited by 567
Distribution of particle sizes in food comminuted by human mastication
Olthoff, L. W., Van Der Bilt, A., Bosman, F., & Kleizen, H. H. (1984) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/0003-9969(84)90089-x · Cited by 293
Epstein, B. (1947) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(47)90465-1 · Cited by 245
Chapter 14. Mastication, Food Transport, and Swallowing
Hiiemae, K. M., & Crompton, A. W. (1985) · Functional Vertebrate Morphology · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674184404.c14 · Cited by 226
Methods for analysing the breakdown of food in human mastication
Lucas, P. W., & Luke, D. A. (1983) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/0003-9969(83)90037-7 · Cited by 220
Self-citationMechanical properties of foods responsible for resisting food breakdown in the human mouth
Agrawal, K. R., Lucas, P. W., Prinz, J. F., & Bruce, I. C. (1997) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/s0003-9969(96)00102-1 · Cited by 211
Self-citation
Cited by
Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work
Lucas, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735011 · Cited by 550
Self-citationSaliva as research material: Biochemical, physicochemical and practical aspects
Schipper, R. G., Silletti, E., & Vingerhoeds, M. H. (2007) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.06.009 · Cited by 532
Particle size distribution in the food bolus after mastication of natural foods
Jalabert-Malbos, M.-L., Mishellany-Dutour, A., Woda, A., & Peyron, M.-A. (2007) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.01.010 · Cited by 351
Aging‐related changes in quantity and quality of saliva: Where do we stand in our understanding?
Xu, F., Laguna, L., & Sarkar, A. (2019) · Journal of Texture Studies · doi:10.1111/jtxs.12356 · Cited by 293
Particle Size Distribution of Food Boluses after Mastication of Six Natural Foods
Peyron, M.-A., Mishellany, A., & Woda, A. (2004) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910408300713 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Prinz, J. F., & Lucas, P. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1997-12-22
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 1389
- Pages
- 1715-1721
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W1990462467
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An optimization model for mastication and swallowing in mammals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1997.0238
- The paper
- Prinz, J. F., & Lucas, P. W. (1997). An optimization model for mastication and swallowing in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.