The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population dynamic theory of size–dependent cannibalism
Open accessAbstract
Cannibalism is characterized by four aspects: killing victims, gaining energy from victims, size-dependent interactions and intraspecific competition. In this review of mathematical models of cannibalistic populations, we relate the predicted population dynamic consequences of cannibalism to its four defining aspects. We distinguish five classes of effects of cannibalism: (i) regulation of population size; (ii) destabilization resulting in population cycles or chaos; (iii) stabilization by damping population cycles caused by other interactions; (iv) bistability such that, depending on the initial conditions, the population converges to one of two possible stable states; and (v) modification of the population size structure. The same effects of cannibalism may be caused by different combinations of aspects of cannibalism. By contrast, the same combination of aspects may lead to different effects. For particular cannibalistic species, the consequences of cannibalism will depend on the presence and details of the four defining aspects. Empirical evidence for the emerged theory of cannibalism is discussed briefly. The implications of the described dynamic effects of cannibalism are discussed in the context of community structure, making a comparison with the community effects of intraguild predation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Resource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,176
Ricker, W. E. (1954) · Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada · doi:10.1139/f54-039 · Cited by 3,152
Carmichael, R. D., & Lotka, A. J. (1926) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2298330 · Cited by 2,723
Kopf, E. W., & Lotka, A. J. (1925) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2965538 · Cited by 2,371
Food Web Complexity and Community Dynamics
Polis, G. A., & Strong, D. R. (1996) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285880 · Cited by 2,109
Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically1
VOLTERRA, V. (1926) · Nature · doi:10.1038/118558a0 · Cited by 2,054
Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1971) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.171.3969.385 · Cited by 1,917
Biological Populations with Nonoverlapping Generations: Stable Points, Stable Cycles, and Chaos
May, R. M. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.186.4164.645 · Cited by 1,681
The Evolution and Dynamics of Intraspecific Predation
Polis, G. A. (1981) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001301 · Cited by 1,327
Cited by
Direct experimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review
Schröder, A., Persson, L., & De Roos, A. M. (2005) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13962.x · Cited by 543
Self-citationVaissi, S., & Sharifi, M. (2016) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21327 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Claessen, D., de Roos, A. M., & Persson, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2004-02-22
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 1537
- Pages
- 333-340
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W1972986756
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population dynamic theory of size–dependent cannibalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2003.2555
- The paper
- Claessen, D., de Roos, A. M., & Persson, L. (2004). Population dynamic theory of size–dependent cannibalism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.