The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population
Open accessAbstract
Resource competition is thought to play a major role in driving evolutionary diversification. For instance, in ecological character displacement, coexisting species evolve to use different resources, reducing the effects of interspecific competition. It is thought that a similar diversifying effect might occur in response to competition among members of a single species. Individuals may mitigate the effects of intraspecific competition by switching to use alternative resources not used by conspecific competitors. This diversification is the driving force in some models of sympatric speciation, but has not been demonstrated in natural populations. Here, we present experimental evidence confirming that competition drives ecological diversification within natural populations. We manipulated population density of three-spine sticklebacks ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ) in enclosures in a natural lake. Increased population density led to reduced prey availability, causing individuals to add alternative prey types to their diet. Since phenotypically different individuals added different alternative prey, diet variation among individuals increased relative to low-density control enclosures. Competition also increased the diet–morphology correlations, so that the frequency-dependent interactions were stronger in high competition. These results not only confirm that resource competition promotes niche variation within populations, but also show that this increased diversity can arise via behavioural plasticity alone, without the evolutionary changes commonly assumed by theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental Plasticity and Evolution
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195122343.001.0001 · Cited by 6,115
Cited by
Introduction to the human gut microbiota
Thursby, E., & Juge, N. (2017) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20160510 · Cited by 3,600
The ecological causes of individual specialisation
Araújo, M. S., Bolnick, D. I., & Layman, C. A. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationEcological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations
YODER, J. B., CLANCEY, E., DES ROCHES, S., EASTMAN, J. M., GENTRY, L., GODSOE, W., HAGEY, T. J., JOCHIMSEN, D., OSWALD, B. P., ROBERTSON, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02029.x · Cited by 731
An evolutionary ecology of individual differences
Dall, S. R. X., Bell, A. M., Bolnick, D. I., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01846.x · Cited by 489
Self-citationFood limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters
Tinker, M. T., Bentall, G., & Estes, J. A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709263105 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Svanbäck, R., & Bolnick, D. I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2006-12-19
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 1611
- Pages
- 839-844
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2120385174
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2006.0198
- The paper
- Svanbäck, R., & Bolnick, D. I. (2007). Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.