Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,074

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ecological causes of individual specialisation

Open access
Araújo, Márcio S., Bolnick, Daniel I., Layman, Craig A.·2011·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2011) 14 : 948–958 Many generalist populations are composed of specialised individuals, whose niches are small subsets of the population niche. This ‘individual specialisation’ is a widespread phenomenon in natural populations, but until recently few studies quantified the magnitude of individual specialisation and how this magnitude varies among populations or contexts. Such quantitative approaches are necessary for us to understand how ecological interactions influence the amount of among‐individual variation, and how the amount of variation might affect ecological dynamics. Herein, we review recent studies of individual specialisation, emphasising the novel insights arising from quantitative measures of diet variation. Experimental and comparative studies have confirmed long‐standing theoretical expectations that the magnitude of among‐individual diet variation depends on the level of intra and interspecific competition, ecological opportunity and predation. In contrast, there is little empirical information as to how individual specialisation affects community dynamics. We discuss some emerging methodological issues as guidelines for researchers studying individual specialisation, and make specific recommendations regarding avenues for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0232 · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0232
  2. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0445 · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0445
  3. 10.1086/592998 · doi:10.1086/592998
  4. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.021 · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.021
  5. 10.1139/z02-022 · doi:10.1139/z02-022
  6. 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80260-4 · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(88)80260-4
  7. 10.1007/s00442-008-1140-9 · doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1140-9
  8. 10.3354/meps08380 · doi:10.3354/meps08380
  9. 10.1073/pnas.0806449106 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806449106
  10. 10.1890/08-0167.1 · doi:10.1890/08-0167.1
  11. 10.1007/s00442-004-1579-2 · doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1579-2
  12. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00517.x · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00517.x
  13. 10.1007/s11284-007-0425-5 · doi:10.1007/s11284-007-0425-5
  14. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00742.x · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00742.x
  15. 10.1007/BF00384938 · doi:10.1007/bf00384938
  16. 10.1890/04-1136 · doi:10.1890/04-1136
  17. Svanbäck R., 2005, Intraspecific competition affects the strength of individual specialisation: an optimal diet theory model, Evol. Ecol. Res., 7, 993
  18. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12657.x · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12657.x
  19. 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00858.x · doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00858.x
  20. 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00300.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00300.x
  21. 10.2307/1937702 · doi:10.2307/1937702

Cited by

See all 1,074

Metadata

Authors
Araújo, M. S., Bolnick, D. I., & Layman, C. A.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-26
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
948-958
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W1547156128
Cited by
1,074
References
82
FWCI
28.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ecological causes of individual specialisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x
The paper
Araújo, M. S., Bolnick, D. I., & Layman, C. A. (2011). The ecological causes of individual specialisation. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.