Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential for female kin associations in wild western gorillas despite female dispersal

Bradley, Brenda J, Doran-Sheehy, Diane M, Vigilant, Linda·2007·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Female philopatry and male dispersal are the norm for most mammals, and females that remain in their natal region often derive foraging or social benefits from proximity to female kin. However, other factors, such as constraints on group size or a shortage of potential mates, may promote female dispersal even when female kin associations would be beneficial. In these cases, female kin associations might develop, not through female philopatry, but through female emigration to the same group. To date, little attention has been focused on the potential for kin-biased behaviour between females in female-dispersing species. Here we investigate the genetic relationships among adults in eight wild groups of unhabituated western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) at the Mondika Research Center using microsatellite genotyping of DNA collected from hair and faeces. We found that almost half (40%) of adult females had an adult female relative in the same group and average within-group relatedness among females was significantly higher than that expected under a model of random dispersal. This provides the first genetic evidence that females can maintain social associations with female relatives in spite of routine natal and secondary dispersal. In addition, we show that females appear to avoid related silverback males when making dispersal decisions, suggesting that a strategy of non-random female dispersal may also function to avoid inbreeding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2007.0407

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5797 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00225-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1159/000073428 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.062 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/284142 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511542312.006 · DOI
  7. Crockett C.M, 1984, Infanticide: comparative and evolutionary perspectives, 173
  8. 10.1534/genetics.106.057331 · DOI
  9. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0267 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/ajp.20075 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03286.x · DOI
  12. 10.1002/ajp.20045 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00664.x · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb00267.x · DOI
  16. Hoelzer G.A, 2004, Kinship and behaviour in primates, 109, 10.1093/oso/9780195148893.003.0005 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.04.015 · DOI
  18. 10.1023/A:1015524931226 · DOI
  19. 10.1023/A:1023784213317 · DOI
  20. Lehmann J, 2007, Sex differences in sociality, Int. J. Primatol
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02560.x · DOI
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)48:1<1::AID-AJP1>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  23. 10.1023/A:1021126920753 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/294160a0 · DOI
  25. 10.1163/156853994X00514 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.05.012 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/351562a0 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/ajp.1074 · DOI
  29. Pusey A, 1979, The great apes, 465
  30. Pusey A.E, 1987, Primate societies, 250
  31. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04226.x · DOI
  32. 10.1002/ajp.20069 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF02373959 · DOI
  34. 10.1023/A:1015581016205 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.1088580 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2277 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/ajp.1350250104 · DOI
  38. 10.1163/156853994X00550 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)42:3<179::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s002650050390 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/ajp.20074 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00265-003-0630-3 · DOI
  43. Sugiyama Y, 1976, Advances in the study of behavior, 255
  44. 10.1007/BF02547825 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.020 · DOI
  46. 10.1163/15685390152032505 · DOI
  47. van Schaik C.P, 1989, Comparative socioecology: the behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals, 195
  48. 10.1007/BF00299705 · DOI
  49. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x · DOI · Paper page
  50. Waser N.M, 1993, The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding, 1
  51. 10.1007/BF02193694 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/ajp.1350320103 · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.241210198 · DOI
  54. 10.1163/156853980X00447 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Bradley, B. J., Doran-Sheehy, D. M., & Vigilant, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Zoology, University of CambridgeCambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
  • Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook UniversityStony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6Leipzig 04103, Germany
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2007-07-03
Volume
274
Issue
1622
Pages
2179-2185
ISSN
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
Cited by
72
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential for female kin associations in wild western gorillas despite female dispersal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2007.0407
The paper
Bradley, B. J., Doran-Sheehy, D. M., & Vigilant, L. (2007). Potential for female kin associations in wild western gorillas despite female dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0407