The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus
Open accessAbstract
Many phenotypic traits show plasticity but behaviour is often considered the ‘most plastic’ aspect of phenotype as it is likely to show the quickest response to temporal changes in conditions or ‘situation’. However, it has also been noted that constraints on sensory acuity, cognitive structure and physiological capacities place limits on behavioural plasticity. Such limits to plasticity may generate consistent differences in behaviour between individuals from the same population. It has recently been suggested that these consistent differences in individual behaviour may be adaptive and the term ‘animal personalities’ has been used to describe them. In many cases, however, a degree of both behavioural plasticity and relative consistency is probable. To understand the possible functions of animal personalities, it is necessary to determine the relative strength of each tendency and this may be achieved by comparison of statistical effect sizes for tests of difference and concordance. Here, we describe a new statistical framework for making such comparisons and investigate cross-situational plasticity and consistency in the duration of startle responses in the European hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus , in the field and the laboratory. The effect sizes of tests for behavioural consistency were greater than for tests of behavioural plasticity, indicating for the first time the presence of animal personalities in a crustacean model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rotjan, R. D., Blum, J., & Lewis, S. M. (2004) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0770-0 · Cited by 57
Cited by
To boldly go: individual differences in boldness influence migratory tendency
Chapman, B. B., Hulthén, K., Blomqvist, D. R., Hansson, L., Nilsson, J., Brodersen, J., Anders Nilsson, P., Skov, C., & Brönmark, C. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01648.x · Cited by 276
The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation.
Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000104 · Cited by 157
Favero, M., Palomba, M., Bizzarri, B. M., Canestrelli, D., & Polverino, G. (2025) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123187 · Cited by 7
Cozzolino, L., Nicastro, K. R., McQuaid, C. D., Halldórsson, H. P., Lima, F. P., & Zardi, G. I. (2025) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118829 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Briffa, M., Rundle, S. D., & Fryer, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2008-03-10
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 1640
- Pages
- 1305-1311
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2158280275
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2008.0025
- The paper
- Briffa, M., Rundle, S. D., & Fryer, A. (2008). Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.