The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width
Open accessAbstract
A species's niche width reflects a balance between the diversifying effects of intraspecific competition and the constraining effects of interspecific competition. This balance shifts when a species from a competitive environment invades a depauperate habitat where interspecific competition is reduced. The resulting ecological release permits population niche expansion, via increased individual niche widths and/or increased among-individual variation. We report an experimental test of the theory of ecological release in three-spine stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ). We factorially manipulated the presence or absence of two interspecific competitors: juvenile cut-throat trout ( Oncorhynchus clarki ) and prickly sculpin ( Cottus asper ). Consistent with the classic niche variation hypothesis, release from trout competition increased stickleback population niche width via increased among-individual variation, while individual niche widths remained unchanged. In contrast, release from sculpin competition had no effect on population niche width, because increased individual niche widths were offset by decreased between-individual variation. Our results confirm that ecological release from interspecific competition can lead to increases in niche width, and that these changes can occur on behavioural time scales. Importantly, we find that changes in population niche width are decoupled from changes in the niche widths of individuals within the population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Cited by
The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology
Violle, C., Enquist, B. J., McGill, B. J., Jiang, L., Albert, C. H., Hulshof, C., Jung, V., & Messier, J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,768
The ecological causes of individual specialisation
Araújo, M. S., Bolnick, D. I., & Layman, C. A. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationAn evolutionary ecology of individual differences
Dall, S. R. X., Bell, A. M., Bolnick, D. I., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01846.x · Cited by 489
Self-citationSingle pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function
Brosi, B. J., & Briggs, H. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1307438110 · Cited by 347
Drivers of individual niche variation in coexisting species
Costa‐Pereira, R., Rudolf, V. H. W., Souza, F. L., & Araújo, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12879 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolnick, D. I., Ingram, T., Stutz, W. E., Snowberg, L. K., Lau, O. L., & Paull, J. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2010-02-17
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 1689
- Pages
- 1789-1797
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2099394592
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2010.0018
- The paper
- Bolnick, D. I., Ingram, T., Stutz, W. E., Snowberg, L. K., Lau, O. L., & Paull, J. S. (2010). Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.