Cited by 47Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus , Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus

Open access
Nelson, Emma, Rolian, Campbell, Cashmore, Lisa, Shultz, Susanne·2011·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

Social behaviour of fossil hominoid species is notoriously difficult to predict owing to difficulties in estimating body size dimorphism from fragmentary remains and, in hominins, low canine size dimorphism. Recent studies have shown that the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D : 4D), a putative biomarker for prenatal androgen effects (PAEs), covaries with intra-sexual competition and social systems across haplorrhines; non-pair-bonded polygynous taxa have significantly lower 2D : 4D ratios (high PAE) than pair-bonded monogamous species. Here, we use proximal phalanx ratios of extant and fossil specimens to reconstruct the social systems of extinct hominoids. Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, Hispanopithecus laietanus and Ardipithecus ramidus have ratios consistent with polygynous extant species, whereas the ratio of Australopithecus afarensis is consistent with monogamous extant species. The early anatomically modern human Qafzeh 9 and Neanderthals have lower digit ratios than most contemporary human populations, indicating increased androgenization and possibly higher incidence of polygyny. Although speculative owing to small sample sizes, these results suggest that digit ratios represent a supplementary approach for elucidating the social systems of fossil hominins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2010.1740

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neanderthals had higher prenatal androgen exposure than anatomically modern humans.

    “Evidence from digit ratio comparisons—a measure of prenatal androgen exposure [28]—further suggests that Neanderthals had higher prenatal androgen exposure than AMH [29].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [18]Manning J. T. 2002. Digit ratio: a pointer to fertility, health, and behavior. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press [Google Scholar]
  2. [19]Manning J. T. 2007. The finger book. London, UK: Faber and Faber [Google Scholar]
  3. [32]Rohlf F. J. 2005. TPSDig2. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, E., Rolian, C., Cashmore, L., & Shultz, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Emma
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
278
Issue
1711
Pages
1556-1563
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2150789656
Cited by
46
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
2D:4D digit ratio, polygyny, social systems, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus afarensis, Neanderthals, early modern humans, proximal phalanx, body size dimorphism, intrasexual competition, monogamy
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Fossils, Humans, Marriage, Pair Bond, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Hominidae, History, Ancient, Finger Phalanges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review