The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women
Open accessAbstract
It is well known that non-human animals respond to information encoded in vocal signals, and the same can be said of humans. Specifically, human voice pitch affects how speakers are perceived. As such, does voice pitch affect how we perceive and select our leaders? To answer this question, we recorded men and women saying ‘I urge you to vote for me this November’. Each recording was manipulated digitally to yield a higher- and lower-pitched version of the original. We then asked men and women to vote for either the lower- or higher-pitched version of each voice. Our results show that both men and women select male and female leaders with lower voices. These findings suggest that men and women with lower-pitched voices may be more successful in obtaining positions of leadership. This might also suggest that because women, on average, have higher-pitched voices than men, voice pitch could be a factor that contributes to fewer women holding leadership roles than men. Additionally, while people are free to choose their leaders, these results clearly demonstrate that these choices cannot be understood in isolation from biological influences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer
(2011) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31821473f7 · Cited by 7,863
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics
VERBA, S., SCHLOZMAN, K. L., & BRADY, H. E. (1995) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · Cited by 6,626
Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3597 · Cited by 5,186
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,169
Eulau, H. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540012235x · Cited by 4,722
Spatial Models of Party Competition
Stokes, D. E. (1963) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952828 · Cited by 1,964
Principles of Voice Production
Titze, I. R., & Martin, D. W. (1998) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.424266 · Cited by 1,643
Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes
Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110589 · Cited by 1,508
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7433999 · Cited by 1,457
Cited by
How Do You Say ‘Hello’? Personality Impressions from Brief Novel Voices
McAleer, P., Todorov, A., & Belin, P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090779 · Cited by 388
Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2014) · The Psychology of Social Status · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_1 · Cited by 187
Voices to reckon with: perceptions of voice identity in clinical and non-clinical voice hearers
Badcock, J. C., & Chhabra, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00114 · Cited by 39
Huang, B., & Sénécal, S. (2023) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2023.2208522 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Peters, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2012-03-14
- Volume
- 279
- Issue
- 1738
- Pages
- 2698-2704
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2096802313
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311
- The paper
- Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Peters, S. (2012). Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.