Cited by 347Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Urinary oxytocin and social bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees

Open access
Crockford, C., Wittig, R. M., Langergraber, K., Ziegler, T. E., Zuberbühler, K., Deschner, T.·2013·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Animals that maintain cooperative relationships show gains in longevity and offspring survival. However, little is known about the cognitive or hormonal mechanisms involved in cooperation. Indeed, there is little support for a main hypothesis that non-human animals have the cognitive capacities required for bookkeeping of cooperative exchanges. We tested an alternative hypothesis that cooperative relationships are facilitated by an endocrinological mechanism involving oxytocin, a hormone required for bonding in parental and sexual relationships across mammals. We measured urinary oxytocin after single bouts of grooming in wild chimpanzees. Oxytocin levels were higher after grooming with bond partners compared with non-bond partners or after no grooming, regardless of genetic relatedness or sexual interest. We ruled out other possible confounds, such as grooming duration, grooming direction or sampling regime issues, indicating that changes in oxytocin levels were mediated by social bond strength. Oxytocin, which is thought to act directly on neural reward and social memory systems, is likely to play a key role in keeping track of social interactions with multiple individuals over time. The evolutionary linkage of an ancestral hormonal system with complex social cognition may be the primary mechanism through which long-term cooperative relationships develop between both kin and non-kin in mammals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2012.2765

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxytocin concentration of urine samples was measured using an established method to sample specific events.

    “We conducted focal animal sampling (23) for 20 adult male and female chimpanzees of two neighboring groups, and measured the oxytocin concentration of urine samples from all individuals using an established method to sample specific events (19, 20).”
  • All samples relating to a target context were collected within the time window of oxytocin excretion into urine at least 15 min after the start and up to 60 min after the end of interactions.

    “All samples relating to a target context were collected within the time window of oxytocin excretion into urine at least 15 min after the start and up to 60 min after the end of interactions (19, 20).”
  • The oxytocinergic system in chimpanzees is involved in prosocial and cooperative behavior between both kin and nonkin group members, such as grooming and food sharing.

    “Also similar to humans, the oxytocinergic system in chimpanzees is involved in prosocial and cooperative behavior between both kin and nonkin group members, such as grooming (19) and food sharing (20), suggesting parallels in oxytocinergic system involvement between humans and chimpanzees.”
  • Oxytocin validations of parallelism and accuracy were conducted and appeared satisfactory.

    “Oxytocin validations of parallelism and accuracy were conducted and appeared satisfactory (19).”
  • Urinary oxytocin measures show biobehaviorally relevant levels following target behaviors or social interactions that occur within the 15 to 60 min time window.

    “Urinary oxytocin measures show biobehaviorally relevant levels following target behaviors or social interactions that occur within this time window (19, 20).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 347

Authors
Crockford, C., Wittig, R. M., Langergraber, K., Ziegler, T. E., Zuberbühler, K., & Deschner, T.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, Madison, WI 53705, USA
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Crockford, C.
  • Wittig, R. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2013-03-22
Volume
280
Issue
1755
Pages
20122765
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2133560070
Cited by
347
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 16
FWCI
48.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P51OD011106)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (NCRR000167)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
social bonding, chimpanzees, grooming, kinship, cooperation, social cognition, social memory, primate social behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Feeding Behavior, Female, Genotype, Grooming, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Male, Oxytocin, Social Behavior, Uganda, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review