Cited by 28Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

System-level approach needed to evaluate the transition to more sustainable agriculture

Open access
Ponisio, Lauren C., Kremen, Claire·2016·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2015.2913

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yields of intensive agriculture come at the cost of destroying ecological processes, which in turn impacts crop development.

    “As yields of intensive agriculture come at the cost of destroying ecological processes, which, in turn, impacts crop development, all ESs should be included in the assessment of agricultural system performance [2].”

    From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [2]

    The passage beginning “Further, the negative consequences” (section and page not provided) says high-input agriculture harms the capacity to produce food and calls for evaluating ecosystem services alongside production and livelihoods. The passage beginning “There is, however, growing evidence” links pest control and pollination services to potential yield gains. The source does not establish the stronger claim that intensive-agriculture yields necessarily come at the cost of destroying ecological processes. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Scientific literature warns about environmental, social, and economic limitations of the current intensive agricultural model.

    “Scientific literature abounds to warn about the environmental, social, and economic limitations of the current intensive agricultural model [1,2].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ponisio, L. C., & Kremen, C.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2016-02-10
Volume
283
Issue
1824
Pages
20152913
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2409148247
Cited by
28
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
sustainable agriculture, agricultural transformation, system-level evaluation, sustainability assessment
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review