The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Discussion on the evolution of the Precambrian crust - Geochemistry of granulite facies rocks and problems of their origin
Abstract
Occurrences of granulite facies rocks are widespread in continental regions where they mostly are parts of stable shield areas. Granulite facies terrains are classified as low-, medium- or high-pressure terrains on the basis of critical mineral associations. Special interest is attached to the medium- and highpressure terrains, as they are representative of the deepest crustal levels available for study in any areal extent on the surface, and may give information about the composition of the lower continental crust. Granulite facies terrains are mainly composed of metamorphic and metasomatic rocks, but magmatic rocks with primary igneous textures interpreted as formed by crystallization of magmas under granulite facies conditions are frequent in some areas. Examples of such rocks are anorthosites, gabbros and mangerites. The low-pressure—high-temperature granulite facies rocks are chemically indistinguishable from the amphibolite facies gneisses with which they characteristically occur. It is therefore important to make a distinction between these and the higher pressure types. The medium- to high-pressure granulite facies terrains are characterized by a less ‘acidic’ average major element compositions, and significant depletions in Rb, Cs, Th and U compared with average surface shield compositions. Available data also indicate low initial Sr isotope ratios, even in the gneissic types. In the author’s opinion the important problem associated with granulite facies rocks is not that of their origin, but rather of their importance as constituents of the continental crust, and how they attained their present chemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Composition of the Continental Crust
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00301-6 · Cited by 5,691
Composition of the Continental Crust
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2003) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/03016-4 · Cited by 3,413
McCulloch, M. T., & Wasserburg, G. J. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.200.4345.1003 · Cited by 752
Carbonic metamorphism, granulites and crustal growth
Newton, R. C., Smith, J. V., & Windley, B. F. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/288045a0 · Cited by 522
Geochemical modeling of mantle differentiation and crustal growth
O'Nions, R. K., Evensen, N. M., & Hamilton, P. J. (1979) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb084ib11p06091 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Heier, K. S.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1973-02-08
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 1235
- Pages
- 429-442
- ISSN
- 0080-4614 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0272
- OpenAlex
- W1973752938
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Discussion on the evolution of the Precambrian crust - Geochemistry of granulite facies rocks and problems of their origin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.1973.0009
- The paper
- Heier, K. S. (1973). A Discussion on the evolution of the Precambrian crust - Geochemistry of granulite facies rocks and problems of their origin. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1973.0009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.