The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure
Abstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a term increasingly used in the last decade to describe a range of systems implemented on full-scale civil infrastructures and whose purposes are to assist and inform operators about continued ‘fitness for purpose’ of structures under gradual or sudden changes to their state, to learn about either or both of the load and response mechanisms. Arguably, various forms of SHM have been employed in civil infrastructure for at least half a century, but it is only in the last decade or two that computer-based systems are being designed for the purpose of assisting owners/operators of ageing infrastructure with timely information for their continued safe and economic operation. This paper describes the motivations for and recent history of SHM applications to various forms of civil infrastructure and provides case studies on specific types of structure. It ends with a discussion of the present state-of-the-art and future developments in terms of instrumentation, data acquisition, communication systems and data mining and presentation procedures for diagnosis of infrastructural ‘health’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 2×
“Despite the body of research dedicated to vibration-based damage detection (VBDD; Doebling et al. 1996), success is limited to simulations, laboratory studies and well-controlled experiments, such as the Z24 bridge (Maeck et al. 2001), and its effectiveness still remains to be proven for…”
Background
Cited by
Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review
Simoen, E., De Roeck, G., & Lombaert, G. (2015) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001 · Cited by 540
Abdeljaber, O., Avci, O., Kiranyaz, M. S., Boashash, B., Sodano, H., & Inman, D. J. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.069 · Cited by 521
Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning
Pathirage, C. S. N., Li, J., Li, L., Hao, H., Liu, W., & Ni, P. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109 · Cited by 415
Review of finite element model updating methods for structural applications
Ereiz, S., Duvnjak, I., & Fernando Jiménez-Alonso, J. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.041 · Cited by 371
Martinez-Luengo, M., Kolios, A., & Wang, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Brownjohn, J. M. W.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2006-12-13
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 1851
- Pages
- 589-622
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W2120356561
- Cited by
- 998
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.