The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures
Abstract
Wireless monitoring has emerged in recent years as a promising technology that could greatly impact the field of structural monitoring and infrastructure asset management. This paper is a summary of research efforts that have resulted in the design of numerous wireless sensing unit prototypes explicitly intended for implementation in civil structures. Wireless sensing units integrate wireless communications and mobile computing with sensors to deliver a relatively inexpensive sensor platform. A key design feature of wireless sensing units is the collocation of computational power and sensors; the tight integration of computing with a wireless sensing unit provides sensors with the opportunity to self-interrogate measurement data. In particular, there is strong interest in using wireless sensing units to build structural health monitoring systems that interrogate structural data for signs of damage. After the hardware and the software designs of wireless sensing units are completed, the Alamosa Canyon Bridge in New Mexico is utilized to validate their accuracy and reliability. To improve the ability of low-cost wireless sensing units to detect the onset of structural damage, the wireless sensing unit paradigm is extended to include the capability to command actuators and active sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 1×
“The use of global modal properties of a structure for damage detection has been hampered by their sensitivity to a structure's environmental factors (e.g. temperature); thus, the onset of structural damage can be difficult to detect (Doebling et al. 1996).”
BackgroundAlgorithms for time synchronization of wireless structural monitoring sensors
Lei, Y., Kiremidjian, A. S., Nair, K. K., Lynch, J. P., & Law, K. H. (2005) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.432 · Cited by 50
Cited by
(2012) · Cited by 1,059
Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies
Ramos, L. F., Marques, L., Lourenço, P. B., De Roeck, G., Campos-Costa, A., & Roque, J. (2010) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.011 · Cited by 443
Martinez-Luengo, M., Kolios, A., & Wang, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085 · Cited by 310
Computational methodologies for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring: A review
Tan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921719877579 · Cited by 186
Huang, Y., Beck, J. L., & Li, H. (2017) · Structural Safety · doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.09.001 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, J. P.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2006-12-14
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 1851
- Pages
- 345-372
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W2098439179
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.2006.1932
- The paper
- Lynch, J. P. (2007). An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1932
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.