Cited by 13Origins and Evolution of LifeEvolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy and History of Science

The simple emergence of complex molecular function

Open access
Manrubia, Susanna·2022·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

with relative ease. At early times of molecular evolution, random polymers could have sufficed for the appearance of incipient chemical activity, while the cellular environment harbours a myriad of proto-functional molecules. The emergence of function is facilitated by several mechanisms intrinsic to molecular organization, such as redundant mapping of sequences into structures, phenotypic plasticity, modularity or cooperative associations between genomic sequences. It is the availability of niches in the molecular ecology that filters new potentially functional proposals. New phenotypes and subsequent levels of molecular complexity could be attained through combinatorial explorations of currently available molecular variants. Natural selection does the rest. This article is part of the theme issue 'Emergent phenomena in complex physical and socio-technical systems: from cells to societies'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2020.0422

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different functions may await just a few mutations apart.

    “Quoting Susanna Manrubia, these properties further ensure that different functions may await just a few mutations apart [46,49,50].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Genotype space is highly redundant, meaning that a huge number of genotypes are consistent with the same phenotype.

    “This is particularly relevant when dealing with the emergence of molecular functions, where the genotype space is highly redundant [46], meaning that a huge number of genotypes are consistent with the same phenotype [47].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [46]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manrubia, S.
Affiliations
Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (ES)
Corresponding author
Manrubia, Susanna
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2022-05-23
Volume
380
Issue
2227
Pages
20200422-20200422
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W3165816790
Cited by
13
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación ("Severo Ochoa" Centers of Excellence to CNB, SEV 2)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades / FEDER funds of the EU (FIS2017-89773-P)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
molecular evolution, emergence of complexity, random polymers, sequence-structure mapping, phenotypic plasticity, modularity, cooperatives, molecular ecology, natural selection
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Biological Evolution, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review