The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physics-inspired analysis of the two-class income distribution in the USA in 1983–2018
Abstract
The first part of this paper is a brief survey of the approaches to economic inequality based on ideas from statistical physics and kinetic theory. These include the Boltzmann kinetic equation, the time-reversal symmetry, the ergodicity hypothesis, entropy maximization and the Fokker–Planck equation. The origins of the exponential Boltzmann–Gibbs distribution and the Pareto power law are discussed in relation to additive and multiplicative stochastic processes. The second part of the paper analyses income distribution data in the USA for the time period 1983–2018 using a two-class decomposition. We present overwhelming evidence that the lower class (more than 90% of the population) is described by the exponential distribution, whereas the upper class (about 4% of the population in 2018) by the power law. We show that the significant growth of inequality during this time period is due to the sharp increase in the upper-class income share, whereas relative inequality within the lower class remains constant. We speculate that the expansion of the upper-class population and income shares may be due to increasing digitization and non-locality of the economy in the last 40 years. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some econophysics models distinguish a two-class structure in income distributions, where working class income follows an exponential distribution (reflecting additive processes) and rentier or capitalist class income follows a power law (reflecting multiplicative processes). See (Ludwig and Yakovenko 2022; Drăgulescu and Yakovenko 2001).”
From "Rich-Get-Richer"? Platform Attention and Earnings Inequality using Patreon Earnings Data (2025) · cites this paper as Ludwig and Yakovenko 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Mechanics of money
Dragulescu, A., & Yakovenko, V. M. (2000) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1007/s100510070114 · Cited by 553
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1016/0378-4371(95)00409-2 · DOI
- Chakrabarti BK. 2005 Econophys-Kolkata: a short story. In Econophysics of wealth distributions (eds A Chatterjee S Yarlagadda BK Chakrabarti) pp. 225–228. Milan Italy: Springer. · DOI
- 10.1007/s100510050249 · DOI
- 10.1007/s100510070173 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00205-3 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1703 · DOI
- Cockshott WP, Cottrell AF, Michaelson GJ, Wright IP, Yakovenko VM. 2019 Classical econophysics. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
- 10.1017/CBO9781139004169 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781316136119 · DOI
- 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60166-y · DOI
- 10.1080/09538259.2016.1205295 · DOI
- Scharfenaker E. 2020 Statistical equilibrium methods in analytical political economy. J. Econ. Surv. (doi:10.1111/joes.12403) · DOI
- 10.1126/science.344.6186.828 · DOI
- 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60213-3 · DOI
- Lifshitz EM, Pitaevskii LP. 1981 Physical kinetics. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- 10.1016/j.physa.2005.04.014 · DOI
- Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. 1980 Statistical physics. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- 10.1119/1.2907776 · DOI
- 10.3390/e16126497 · DOI
- 10.3390/e15125565 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121420 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00298-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1209/epl/i2004-10330-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/PL00011112 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11403-017-0211-6 · DOI
- Pareto V. 1897 Cours d’Économie Politique. Lausanne, Switzerland: L’Université de Lausanne.
- Gibrat R. 1931 Les Inégalités Economiques. Paris: Sirely.
- 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01663-1 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075032 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.015 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsta.1895.0010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physa.2017.01.071 · DOI
- Kakwani N. 1980 Income inequality and poverty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
"Rich-Get-Richer"? Platform Attention and Earnings Inequality using Patreon Earnings Data
Strauss, I., Yang, J., & Mazzucato, M. (2025) · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Ludwig, D., & Yakovenko, V. M.
- Affiliations
- JQI, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2022-04-11
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 2224
- ISSN
- 1364-503X
- 1471-2962
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics-inspired analysis of the two-class income distribution in the USA in 1983–2018. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.2021.0162
- The paper
- Ludwig, D., & Yakovenko, V. M. (2022). Physics-inspired analysis of the two-class income distribution in the USA in 1983–2018. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0162