The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organization of the primate retina: Light microscopy, with an appendix: A second type of midget bipolar cell in the primate retina
Abstract
The structure of the human, but mainly of the rhesus monkey, retina as examined by Golgi-staining techniques is described and interpreted on evidence from both light and electron microscopy. One type of rod bipolar cell and two types of cone bipolar cell are recognized. The rod bipolar is exclusively connected to rods. The midget bipolar is postsynaptic to only one cone but each cone is also presynaptic to a diffuse cone (flat) bipolar. Such flat bipolar cells are in synaptic relationship with about seven cones. No other bipolar cell types have been found. The brush bipolar of Polyak is interpreted as probably a distorted rod bipolar, while Polyak’s centrifugal bipolar is a misinterpretation of the morphology of diffuse amacrine cells. When presumptive centrifugal bipolars were observed they appeared to be a developmental stage of amacrine cells. In the outer plexiform layer two types of horizontal cell have been defined. Each type of horizontal cell has a single axon and two kinds of horizontal cell axon terminals are recognized. In the inner plexiform layer there are two main classes of amacrine cells: the stratified amacrines and the diffuse amacrines. Each class of amacrine has a wide variety of shapes. Polyak’s midget ganglion cell is confirmed and his five other kinds of ganglion cell are classified into diffuse and stratified ganglion cells according to the level at which their dendrites branch within the inner plexiform layer. A fuller summary is given by the diagram and in the legend of figure 98, p. 174. A new type of midget bipolar is described in the Appendix (p. 177).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589
Parallel visual pathways: A review
Lennie, P. (1980) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90115-7 · Cited by 509
The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina
Dacey, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-12-05334.1993 · Cited by 480
Rod Vision: Pathways and Processing in the Mammalian Retina
Bloomfield, S. A., & Dacheux, R. F. (2001) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00031-8 · Cited by 375
Origins of crossed and uncrossed retinal projections in pigmented and albino mice
Dräger, U. C., & Olsen, J. F. (1980) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901910306 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Boycott, B. B., & Dowling, J. E.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1969-03-27
- Volume
- 255
- Issue
- 799
- Pages
- 109-184
- ISSN
- 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0280
- OpenAlex
- W2056038780
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of the primate retina: Light microscopy, with an appendix: A second type of midget bipolar cell in the primate retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1969.0004
- The paper
- Boycott, B. B., & Dowling, J. E. (1969). Organization of the primate retina: Light microscopy, with an appendix: A second type of midget bipolar cell in the primate retina. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1969.0004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.