The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement and compensation of defocusing and aberrations by Fourier processing of electron micrographs
Abstract
The effects of defocusing and spherical aberration in the electron microscope image are most simply and directly displayed in the Fourier transform of the image. We have investigated the process of image formation by determining the changes in the transform of the image of a thin crystal of catalase, which has discrete diffraction maxima in the resolution range of 10 to 2.5 nm, as a function of defocusing. The changes in amplitude and phase of these diffraction maxima have been measured and compared with the predictions of a first-order theory of image formation. The theory is generally confirmed, and the transfer function of the microscope is completely determined by finding the relative contributions from phase and amplitude contrast. A ‘true’ maximum contrast image of the catalase crystal, compensated for the effects of defocusing, is reconstructed from the set of micrographs in the focal series. The relation of this compensated image to individual underfocused micrographs, and the use of underfocus contrast enhancement in conventional electron microscopy, are discussed. This approach and the experimental methods can be extended to high resolution in order to compensate for spherical aberration as well as defocusing. In as much as spherical aberration is the factor presently limiting the resolution of electron lenses, this could provide a considerable extension of the resolution of the electron microscope.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens
Dubochet, J., Adrian, M., Chang, J.-J., Homo, J.-C., Lepault, J., McDowall, A. W., & Schultz, P. (1988) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583500004297 · Cited by 2,389
Structural organization of authentic, mature HIV‐1 virions and cores
Briggs, J. A. G., Wilk, T., Welker, R., Kräusslich, H., & Fuller, S. D. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg143 · Cited by 496
Leginon: An Automated System for Acquisition of Images from Vitreous Ice Specimens
Carragher, B., Kisseberth, N., Kriegman, D., Milligan, R. A., Potter, C. S., Pulokas, J., & Reilein, A. (2000) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1006/jsbi.2000.4314 · Cited by 313
Schur, F. K. M., Hagen, W. J. H., de Marco, A., & Briggs, J. A. G. (2013) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.015 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Erickson, H. P., & Klug, A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1971-05-27
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 837
- Pages
- 105-118
- ISSN
- 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0280
- OpenAlex
- W2117948104
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement and compensation of defocusing and aberrations by Fourier processing of electron micrographs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1971.0040
- The paper
- Erickson, H. P., & Klug, A. (1971). Measurement and compensation of defocusing and aberrations by Fourier processing of electron micrographs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.