The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The structure of the caudate nucleus of the cat: light and electron microscopy
Abstract
The caudate nucleus of the cat appears to be homogeneous when examined with the light or electron microscope, except for a layer beneath the ependyma where there is a high concentration of glial cells and few neurons. In sections of brains stained with thionin the nerve cells in the caudate nucleus fall into three size groups: less than 8 μm, 9 to 18 μm, greater than 20 μm. Examination of material impregnated with the Golgi technique shows that there are six cell types (one small, four medium and one large), and these are distinguishable on the basis of the size of the cell somata and the appearance and arrangement of their dendrites. One type of medium cell with many dendritic spines forms over 95 % of the cell population. The large and one medium cell type are tentatively identified as the source of the efferent fibres of the nucleus. These efferent fibres and the axons of the remaining medium cell types have collateral branches. Three groups of possible afferent fibres have been identified, and these and the collateral branches of the intrinsic neurons form a dense plexus whose individual fibres cross dendrites rather than lie parallel to them. Six cell types may also be distinguished with the electron microscope, and four of these can be correlated directly with those seen in Golgi impregnated material. Several kinds of dendrites are present, the commonest having numerous spines. Fewer spines are present on other varieties of dendrite, and those dendrites which are varicose have no spines. Numerous fine, nonmyelinated axons are present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop
Parent, A., & Hazrati, L.-N. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c · Cited by 2,161
The neostriatal mosaic: multiple levels of compartmental organization in the basal ganglia
Gerfen, C. R. (1992) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.001441 · Cited by 1,004
Gerfen, C., Herkenham, M., & Thibault, J. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-12-03915.1987 · Cited by 803
Lavdas, A. A., Grigoriou, M., Pachnis, V., & Parnavelas, J. G. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-18-07881.1999 · Cited by 765
Gerfen, C. R., & Scott Young, W. (1988) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(88)91217-6 · Cited by 658
Metadata
- Authors
- Kemp, J. M., & Powell, T. P. S.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1971-09-30
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 845
- Pages
- 383-401
- ISSN
- 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0280
- OpenAlex
- W2108712999
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structure of the caudate nucleus of the cat: light and electron microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1971.0102
- The paper
- Kemp, J. M., & Powell, T. P. S. (1971). The structure of the caudate nucleus of the cat: light and electron microscopy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.