The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms
Abstract
Collected lists of nuclear DNA amounts estimated for a total of almost 1000 angiosperm species were published by Bennett & Smith (Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 274, 227—274 (1976)), and by Bennett et al. (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 216, 179-199 (1982a)). Subsequently, work on nuclear genome size in flowering plant taxa, and interest in its consequences, has increased. Thus, estimates for 588 angiosperm species not previously listed were published, or communicated to us, between 1982 and mid-1986. As these additional estimates came from more than 50 sources which were either widely scattered in the scientific literature or unpublished personal communications, they are not readily accessible. This, and the many personal enquiries for the information received, shows that a further publication, compiling the new data is needed. This paper, therefore, contains a further supplementary list of absolute DNA amounts. This new compilation includes DNA C values for 629 angiosperm species not listed in either of the above-mentioned papers, with additional estimates for 119 species already listed by them. These data are assembled primarily for reference purposes. Analysis of citations of the two previously published lists and of personal requests for additional information both show that the major users of genome size information are cell and molecular biologists. Consequently, the species are listed as before in alphabetical order, rather than by any taxonomic scheme, as this was felt to be more helpful to these users
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barker, D. G., Bianchi, S., Blondon, F., Dattée, Y., Duc, G., Essad, S., Flament, P., Gallusci, P., Génier, G., Guy, P., et al. (1990) · Plant Molecular Biology Reporter · doi:10.1007/bf02668879 · Cited by 398
Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms: Progress, Problems and Prospects
BENNETT, M. D. (2005) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mci003 · Cited by 384
Self-citationPellicer, J., Powell, R. F., & Leitch, I. J. (2021) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_17 · Cited by 205
Yokoya, K. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1102 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, M. D., & Smith, J. B.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1991-12-30
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 1271
- Pages
- 309-345
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W3144159342
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1991.0120
- The paper
- Bennett, M. D., & Smith, J. B. (1991). Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1991.0120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.