The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From insect vision to robot vision
Abstract
Airborne insects are miniature w ing-flapping aircraft the visually guided manoeuvres of which depend on analogue, ‘fly-by-wire’ controls. The front-end of their visuomotor system consists of a pair of com pound eyes which are masterpieces of integrated optics and neural design. They rely on an array of passive sensors driving an orderly analogue neural network. We explored in concrete terms how motion-detecting neurons might possibly be used to solve navigational tasks involving obstacle avoidance in a creature whose wings are exquisitely guided by eyes with a poor spatial resolution. We designed, simulated, and built a complete terrestrial creature which moves about and avoids obstacles solely by evaluating the relative motion between itself and the environment. The compound eye uses an array of elementary motion detectors (emds) as smart, passive ranging sensors. Like its physiological counterpart, the visuomotor system is based on analogue, continuous-time processing and does not make use of conventional computers. It uses hardly any memory to adjust the robot’s heading in real time via a local and intermittent visuomotor feedback loop. This paper shows that the understanding of some invertebrate sensory-motor systems has now reached a level able to provide valuable design hints. Our approach brings into prominence the mutual constraints in the designs of a sensory and a motor system, in both living and non-living ambulatory creatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A robust layered control system for a mobile robot
Brooks, R. (1986) · IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/jra.1986.1087032 · Cited by 7,799
Handbook of Sensory Physiology
Sanders, M. D. (1975) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.59.2.111-c · Cited by 7,166
Separate visual pathways for perception and action
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · Cited by 6,519
Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1959) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308 · Cited by 4,653
What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain
Lettvin, J., Maturana, H., McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1959) · Proceedings of the IRE · doi:10.1109/jrproc.1959.287207 · Cited by 1,990
Handbuch der physiologischen Optik
Helmholtz, H. L. F. (2011) · DFG Viewer (DFG Viewer) · Cited by 1,947
Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology.
Dennett, D. C., & Braitenberg, V. (1986) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185146 · Cited by 1,616
The interpretation of a moving retinal image
Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Prazdny, K. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0057 · Cited by 1,421
Strausfeld, N. J. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 967
VISUALLY CONTROLLED LOCOMOTION AND VISUAL ORIENTATION IN ANIMALS*
GIBSON, J. J. (1958) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00656.x · Cited by 809
Cited by
Chiel, H. J., & Beer, R. D. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01149-1 · Cited by 864
A soft body as a reservoir: case studies in a dynamic model of octopus-inspired soft robotic arm
Nakajima, K., Hauser, H., Kang, R., Guglielmino, E., Caldwell, D. G., & Pfeifer, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00091 · Cited by 180
Morphological Computation – Connecting Brain, Body, and Environment
Pfeifer, R., & Gómez, G. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00616-6_5 · Cited by 157
Coevolution of active vision and feature selection
Floreano, D., Kato, T., Marocco, D., & Sauser, E. (2004) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-004-0467-5 · Cited by 97
Self-Organized Aggregation Triggers Collective Decision Making in a Group of Cockroach-Like Robots
Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Jost, C., & Theraulaz, G. (2009) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712309103430 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Franceschini, N., Pichon, J. M., & Blanes, C.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1992-09-29
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- 1281
- Pages
- 283-294
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2332578720
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From insect vision to robot vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1992.0106
- The paper
- Franceschini, N., Pichon, J. M., & Blanes, C. (1992). From insect vision to robot vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.