Cited by 180Soft Robotics and ApplicationsRobotic Locomotion and ControlAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

A soft body as a reservoir: case studies in a dynamic model of octopus-inspired soft robotic arm

Open access
Nakajima, Kohei, Hauser, Helmut, Kang, Rongjie, Guglielmino, Emanuele, Caldwell, Darwin G., Pfeifer, Rolf·2013·Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Abstract

The behaviors of the animals or embodied agents are characterized by the dynamic coupling between the brain, the body, and the environment. This implies that control, which is conventionally thought to be handled by the brain or a controller, can partially be outsourced to the physical body and the interaction with the environment. This idea has been demonstrated in a number of recently constructed robots, in particular from the field of "soft robotics". Soft robots are made of a soft material introducing high-dimensionality, non-linearity, and elasticity, which often makes the robots difficult to control. Biological systems such as the octopus are mastering their complex bodies in highly sophisticated manners by capitalizing on their body dynamics. We will demonstrate that the structure of the octopus arm cannot only be exploited for generating behavior but also, in a sense, as a computational resource. By using a soft robotic arm inspired by the octopus we show in a number of experiments how control is partially incorporated into the physical arm's dynamics and how the arm's dynamics can be exploited to approximate non-linear dynamical systems and embed non-linear limit cycles. Future application scenarios as well as the implications of the results for the octopus biology are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fncom.2013.00091

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some evidence points to the potential of mechanical properties of the arm to serve a direct computational role.

    “Not only can mechanical properties of the arm facilitate computation, some evidence points to the potential of these properties to serve a direct computational role (Nakajima et al., 2013; Nakajima et al., 2014; Nakajima et al., 2015).”

    From Lessons for Robotics From the Control Architecture of the Octopus (2022) · cites this paper as Nakajima et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Khalil H. K. (2002). Nonlinear Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakajima, K., Hauser, H., Kang, R., Guglielmino, E., Caldwell, D. G., & Pfeifer, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
Corresponding author
Nakajima, Kohei
Venue
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
91-91
ISSN
1662-5188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986237366
Cited by
180
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (231608)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
soft robotics, octopus arm, octopus-inspired robot, body dynamics, dynamic control, nonlinear dynamical systems, limit cycles, embodied control, soft materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review